The primary favored the winner, and threatened the repeaters. The teacher is being investigated by the full committee and the winner - Paola Cascella
Sitting before the committee, the candidate admits: "I'm going to the ball." Anxiety, tension? Who knows. However, the scene is silent. The President then runs to the rescue and gives her a break. Second round: the doctor who is competing for a place at university researcher BIO/14 Pharmacology, tries again. The result: a hearing soon enough, according to the evaluation of the whole committee. And yet she is the winner of the contest, Elizabeth Polazzi, 39, from Bologna, the Faculty of Science, Department of Advanced Studies. In its favor several publications and two written tests of a good standard. Too bad that in the minutes of examination, the record number 6, that his impasse was resolved by the president with unprecedented chivalry, there is no trace. E 'in March 2008.
After one year the competition is over on the desk of Antonello Gustapane pm following a complaint by two of the five competitors who have rejected building on the Tar, obtaining the result of freezing. Now Polazzi is investigated with the entire committee: the president Ottavio Gandolfi, 62, director of the department of pharmacology and professor at the medical school Alma mater, and Commissioners Maria Enrica Fracasso, 64, associate professor of the same department but of 'University of Verona, and Fabio Tascedda 38 years, a researcher at the department of biomedical sciences at the University of Modena. They load the prosecutor assumes the offenses of forgery and ideological material, and abuse of office. Gandolfi also responds to concussion because he would try to convince the repeaters not to submit, even "looked forward to retaliation on their future career within the department." On Tuesday, the NAS Carabinieri raided his studio in may in Irnerio 48, and also the 'home, in a square in the historic center. According to the lawyer Guido
Magnisi who along with colleagues Anthony Caruso and Beatrice Belli defends the two doctors rejected (an allocation of research and a fellow of the same department led by Professor Gandolfi) oral examination of the competition was a series of "embarrassing irregularity ' . All in favor of Dr. Polazzi. In addition to advise you to sit in the classroom to calm down, then allowing a second chance, and Gandolfi other examiners would have offered numerous assists. For example, while waiting to be questioned again by the committee, Dr. is in a position to explore the theme chosen by lot from her, on which, at first showed "grave uncertainty." How? Listening to the responses of another candidate who, incidentally, are asked questions on the same spot, "despite the argument she was raffled to another." Not only that. According to the indictment, including Professor Tascedda she strives to provide "an unfair aid" through a schemino on a sheet with which "highlights the different possible forms of interactionism between the drugs (the theme of exam note) on which The candidate should have to dwell in the exposition of the answer. "
The complaint started in early March after the appeal to the TAR. The rejected candidates had known that dance was a proposal to cancel the interview and the competition based only on publications and writings.
(02 April 2009)
0 comments:
Post a Comment