Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Substitution For Eggs In Salmon

sold Tests at the University of Catanzaro

Scandal in Calabria: 48 degrees seized suspected

are about 48 degrees in law are regarded as' suspect 'and therefore seized by the prosecutor of Catanzaro in' scope of an investigation into alleged examination sold Magna Graecia University of Calabria and the capital that had already led to the arrest of an official of the university. "There are some people who have obtained the qualification to the legal practice and are members of professional associations," said prosecutor Antonio Vincenzo Lombardo, while stressing that it is "a gnawing number." About a dozen which is to be entered several orders of Calabria, and in some regions of northern Italy. People who have now been seized degrees are investigated at various levels of corruption, falsification of public document, false, by induction, suppression and distribution of documents and the misuse of the legal profession. It is yet to be ascertained, however, if those who have obtained the qualification in question, have also had the same facilities as that is unlawful, for example, but not to take the examination in the booklet to find the certification of overcoming it. Meanwhile, the Public Prosecutor's Office has seen fit to report the names of professional associations of persons under investigation and which was seized a law degree. Then touches the orders then provide forensic, at least for the moment, to suspend the people involved in the investigation until it is finally shed light on their positions. A survey coordinated by Deputy Attorney Paul Salvatore Curcio and oil, which began in 2007, had resulted in the arrest and sentenced to three years' imprisonment for officials of the University of Catanzaro Francesco Marcello, on charges of receiving money in exchange for the falsification of academic books. In September 2008, moreover, always the prosecutor had seized another 13 degrees, which were then confiscated following the settlement of the suspects. Matilde Geraci




They could be enough to get 300 € attest to the book have passed an examination, which was never actually supported. He revealed a student of the Faculty of Law, who worked in the investigation that led to the arrest last year of an official University of Catanzaro, Francesco Marcello is accused of receiving payments in exchange for the falsification of certain examinations and convicted at first instance. Corruption, falsification of public document, false, by induction, suppression and destruction of records, improper exercise of the legal profession, these are allegations that the prosecutors and Paul Catanzaro Salvatore Curcio oil have served to as many doctors in law, combined with a decree search and seizure with which the police department operating in the city of Calabria have scoured the archives of the administrative offices of the University of Catanzaro, looking for evidence of crime reflected the assumptions made by the magistrates. 'In the university - Has told prosecutors the student employee - we knew that it was possible to buy the examinations by Mr. Marcello. Speaking then I have been told that there were people who were moving smartly, bringing students in trouble, that maybe they had some problems to overcome exam. Then from there you had to rely completely on them. " So when you fail an exam, just ask them that regulated everything, putting on the books and forged signatures on statins, but they had not reckoned with a professor who knows by heart the names of students who exams. The investigation, which had been started from a complaint a professor who had noticed that the libretto of a graduate student there were too many scratches, but also that it had passed the exam on his subject without knowing anything about the teacher. The investigation by the prosecutor's office of Catanzaro, which led to the seizure of 48 degrees continues, then beat serrato.I on disposition of the soldiers of the deputy public prosecutor Salvatore Curcio, have seized a substantial documentation in the administrative offices of the faculty which is now being studied by investigators. "A timely complaint which in its time, the bodies of the university had submitted to the Prosecutor of Catanzaro is its elements of clarity." It was the first comment of the Rector of the University of Catanzaro, Francesco Saverio Costanzo, who expressed a "clear appreciation for the manner and timing with which the public prosecutor of Catanzaro has been clear about what was complained of by the University , 'Magna Graecia', on suspicions of irregularities in the certificate of university exams for the degree course in law. This fact reassures us - adds the Chancellor - it shows that the path chosen by our University to the highest degree of care, control and transparency to devote to all aspects of administrative life, is a choice that pays off. This approach will be further pursued and reinforced in every aspect of academic life. " "It's a situation that is ongoing and opens disturbing scenarios" - commented the President of the Bar of Catanzaro, Giuseppe Iannello -. We are concerned especially for those cases of lawyers who are already working. The fact, then, speaks for itself. We have to wait, though. conclude that the prosecutor's investigation to fully understand what and 'widespread phenomenon. In the coming days there will be a meeting of the council and I do not exclude that we will face this event too. "




"He has bought a degree in Law in Catanzaro"

THE CASE. A resident in the Calabrian city among the 48 investigated for corruption. Some tests would have supported them

infidel would pay an official of the University "Magna Graecia" to get votes on the record book. He now works for a private company


There is also a fake doctors in Vicenza among law proclaimed by the University of Catanzaro Magna Graecia. It is the contention of the Calabrian prosecutor who coordinated investigation by the police and that the other morning has sent notices of investigation to 48 people accused of corruption in various ways, falsification of public document, false, by induction, suppression and destruction of documents and unlawful practice of the profession.
Salvatore Vaccaro, 40, a native of Croton, but long resident in the city where he works in a private company, is among those who would buy any evaluation of the university paying the unfaithful servant Francesco Marcello, 50, of Catanzaro, already ; arrested in recent months during the first phase of the investigation and to whom the court has already imposed three years' imprisonment. The degree of
Vaccaro, like the other 47 new suspects, was seized by the prosecutor and now the "doctor" runs the risk of being confiscated his degree. Paper, as happened for the first 13 graduates who wished to negotiate.
On the other hand, is the reasoning of the prosecutor in Calabria, that title has been obtained on invalid assumptions. In order to attain the time of the dissertation before the faculty committee, which opens the way to the proclamation of "doctor" and the diploma, you must have passed all the exams included in the curriculum. It was not the case, for example, Vaccaro, which is alleged to have bought some tests that apparently could not or did not intend to deal with.

The mechanism discovered by the police was actually quite simple: Marcello, former head of the secretariat of the students, and cash in bribes in exchange for falsifying books and records of the various academic subjects, or raising the votes at will in reality testing or recording and never incurred. No one in the office, one would have noticed anything.
To find out the dust in 2007, was the attorney who had discovered a perverse criminal circuit in college. And now, after the first trial, there were a number of other cases of sale of tests that led then to graduate.
The case of Vicenza, however, is the least serious. Among the 47 other suspects are in fact 10 members of their provincial lawyers (especially in Calabria, but also to the north of Italy) and 25 practitioners. Practicing lawyer, but without authority.
And still other suspects work in public after winning state competitions, which were able to access, due to a law degree. Their position remains to be evaluated, and it is possible that if the process is complete, which will start at the end of the investigations, their title will be canceled in those contests have to be redone after years of their conclusion.

Vaccaro, however, work for a private company, and therefore should not have problems at work. Also remains to be verified, explained by Catanzaro, what will the Council of the University's Faculty of Law of the 48 cases identified so far during the investigation: to be canceled in whole university curricula of suspects, or they are really and legally to be redone examinations that have bought from Marcellus, and of course the argument?

Diego Blacks - Il Giornale di Vicenza - 25/03/2009




sold Tests at the University of Catanzaro. The pro-rector: there muddying The university set up a disciplinary committee to assess measures against students and graduates involved


Among the addressees of that measure ten lawyers, engaged in the professional members of different orders as well as the Calabria region in northern Italy, 25 trainee lawyers 13 professionals and successful candidates in the public service.


Vincent de Iudicibus. Il Messaggero - Rome (31 March) - It was presented at the university for his moment of glory, fully dressed and with a thick crowd of relatives and friends in tow. But one of the professors in the committee, while the student setting out his thesis in Economics company, had a sudden flash: the girl had argued with him a test and refused a 18. Since then he had not seen her, and wondered how he could have passed the examination in other ways, getting to graduation day. The scandal of the tests "sold". Thus was born from the suspicion of a teacher become the first certainty, then complained to the Prosecutor's Office, the line of investigation on the scandal of the tests "sold" Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro. Philo that from November 2007 to date has spread like wildfire involving the right of Law, with the cancellation of 48 degrees last week. Among the recipients of the measure ten lawyers, engaged in the professional members of different orders as well as the Calabria region in northern Italy, 25 and 13 lawyers practicing professionals in the public amministrazione.L successful candidates' survey covers a period of time ranging 2000 to 2007. Years in which they consumed in Catanzaro a true sale of tests that were not even supported. To make this possible was the official voice of the university teaching Marcello Francesco (sentenced to three years' imprisonment), which was paid to falsify statins, making look like tests never exceeded incurred. For 65 times he had done without being detected. But there is the Magna Graecia to sink in the scandal. Why the Vice Rector of the University Luigi Ventura, Dean of the Faculty of Law, tells the story of graduating in Economics: "Now after noting the anomaly of the student we have established a technical committee - said - We tested three other similar cases and incidents reported to the Public Prosecutor's Office to investigate how the forgeries were done exams. We were the first ever institution that is self-reported, even aware of what effect that this would bring. " The maxifascicolo scandal sees members under investigation 68 people. The charges range for criminal association with aggravated theft. And then, again, abuse of office, embezzlement, corruption and deceit material and ideological. The university set up a disciplinary committee. The university has set up a disciplinary committee in recent days to examine the position of students and graduates involved in the investigation, and has a civil "on students and graduates have disciplinary powers - continued Ventura - Can we cancel the examinations and degrees and suspend students for up to three years. In reality, what we would do would be to expel them, but the law does not allow him to. " The theft of the test for admission to Medicine. Another tranche of the investigation concerns the theft of the test for admission to medical school: the judges have asked for an extension three months to dismantle the network of complicity that is hidden behind the statements and employee information Cuteri Antonio 's cleaner and supervision of classrooms Walter Mancuso, both involved and will be considered in April. Even in this case the pro-rector Ventura wants to emphasize the immediacy of the complaint: "I was at university in the afternoon when he saw the Rector of what had happened - he says - the next morning we were to withdraw from the attorney & rsquo ; happened. Sorry to see what is involved in these scandals and dirty from the mud that was thrown at the teachers, and students pertaining to these maneuvers have always studied and have always been busy. " The entries do not decrease. But the scandals do not discourage enrollment. Over the past two years, in fact, the inscriptions to Magna Graecia not decreased, "We have four thousand members and growing requirements - concludes Ventura - Even in the hardest hit by the scandal may, that of law: every year with the limited number of inputs we expect 600, but requests always exceed the roof of admissions. "


Green Mucus Coming Out Of Eyes

Antitrust: professional, closed caste

According to the survey Antitrust act as the professional castes have, unjustified privileges and are reluctant to change.

On completion of the Authority's consultation period on 13 January 2007 in the professional game. The result is a bleak picture: categories reluctant to change and innovation in national codes of practice are required to increase the competitive pressure in the individual compartments. We are speaking of professional architects, lawyers, career counselors, pharmacists, geologists, surveyors, journalists, engineers, doctors and dentists, solicitors, industrial experts, psychologists, accountants and accountants. Their behavior is comparable, according to the supervisory body for the competition, that of caste as having undue privileges - permitted by a regulatory law is unique in Europe - and extremely reluctant to change.
More specifically, the 13 categories professional concerned did not seize the growth opportunities offered by liberalization of the agreed professional fee, the ability to create companies and multi-disciplinary advertising information. On the contrary, they were even seen as obstacles to the conduct of its business. Few positive exceptions: a surveyors, accountants, industrial technicians and pharmacists, the Antitrust Authority has recognized the merit of having "adequate codes of conduct in respect to the determination of the professional fee to the principles of competition." The Antitrust Authority launches and then the warning to professional bodies, urging them to lose no more time to adapt to European norms.
The Guarantor also suggests the use of legal instruments to combat the inertia of the orders. Among the most urgent is the need to create suitable access routes to the professions easier, through university courses and internships designed on the real learning needs and a set time limit. Should be developed the concept of "professional decorum" in order to promote competition between health professionals and the professional integrity to clients. According to the Consumers Association and the Young Lawyers ADUC, any attempt to reform the professional associations would be useless: the only way to "democratize offers and requests is entirely abolished.
Noemi Ricci - Monday, March 23, 2009
Source: http://www.pmi.it/lavoro-e-imprenditoria/news/4605/antitrust-professionisti-caste-chiuse.html

L ' Antitrust criticizes the professional - act like caste
an investigation suggests strong opposition to the principles of liberalization on the part of the free professionisti.Milano - According to the Antitrust doctors, architects, journalists, psychologists, dentists, lawyers, notaries, Accountants acting as caste, enjoy privileges without rules and strong contrast change. The survey conducted in January showed a clear position of the orders professional, who are opposed to natural innovations that their codes of conduct need to feed a healthy and fair competition within them.
The Authority has invited them to adjust orders as soon as possible with the European directives, leaving room for the changes needed to get out of the stillness in which stagnate; a good start would be the introduction of less tortuous paths for access to the professions, the liberalization of fees, advertising information and the possibility of establishing multi-disciplinary company.
"All this is seen as a threat from groups who are unable to see the great opportunities for growth in competitiveness," commented Supervisor who trusts in an intervention by the legislature in the final abolition of minimum rates fixed or still present in the Bersani law of 2006.
Valentina Matera
The Antitrust: "Professional associations act as caste"
Architects, lawyers, career counselors, pharmacists, geologists, surveyors, journalists, engineers, doctors and dentists, solicitors, industrial experts, psychologists, accountants and accounting experts . Professional associations, according to the Antitrust Authority, acting as the "caste". Unwarranted privileges and high resistance to change. The body which oversees competition has ended an investigation under way since 2007 on the orders professional. And to ensure the result is worrisome: "The survey finding of 13 professional societies, launched in January 2007 and show an unwillingness of the categories, albeit with positive exceptions, to welcome those innovations in the codes of ethics required to enhance competitive edge within individual sectors.''fact,''the liberalization of the agreed professional fee, the ability to advertise and set up companies in multi-disciplinary information - states in its conclusions - have not been educated as significant opportunities for growth, but as an obstacle to the profession.''orders, according to the Antitrust, can no longer delay in adapting to European standards. So the Supervisor called for the legislative instruments act against the inaction of the orders. It proposes changes "necessary" as "to provide easier access routes to the profession" through university courses and "placement proportionate to the actual learning needs," not infinite stage. It would also be fair, the second body, that the term "professional decorum" and "element that encourages competition between health professionals and strengthen the professional duties of fairness to customers and to drive economic behavior of professionals." According to 'Consumers' Association ADUC, the words Antitrust "do justice to a situation under the eyes of all: the reform efforts of the orders are useless. Even if something were to appear, it may still be smoke and mirrors. Only their removal could democratize offers and requests'' .

How Do You Erase Your Poptropica Account

Examination 2008. Palermo. Climate from the market.

exam scam in Palermo. Candidates are afraid of retaliation and do not report to the Prosecutor's Office. But a group of them is collecting memories and testimonies.
On Occasion of the state exams for the qualification to legal profession, 2008, at a complex of Palermo Viale delle Science, there were three written tests. I was among the candidates. bombshellf climate I breathed in by the market. Commissioners gave it shamelessly pizzini and notes to the candidates, they explained, indicated exhibitions, answer the questions. The traces of the Ministry did not require great effort and I think, I hope, that exceeds the exam. Now I ask: why is not abolished this review is offensive to my intelligence, my character and the crowd brings out the true fabric of narrow-minded luminaries with the last name of gold and are also leaders of the recommendation, dell'inciucio, 's fraud and the offense? Now I have to laugh, but believe me, there in that place of exams I was ashamed because I copied myself. Most of the plagiarized in truth is honest people who arranges and adapts in some way to the bold and unreserved battleship recommended that the task of the already receive a fair copy. Commissioner may carry out a theme instead of the candidate? I condemn the fact or uninterested in what?

Harold Kumar Bottomless Party Scene

2001. So the lawyer became Gelmini

In the city of Calabria in the previous year's record admitted with 93 per cent. Da Brescia a Reggio Calabria. So Gelmini became a lawyer. The enrollment exam in 2001. Education Minister: "I had to work right away."

Ninety percent admitted to oral! How can you resist the temptation? And so, one of the scoundrels who in 2001 came down from the deep North to take the exams as a lawyer in Reggio Calabria also slipped Mariastella Gelmini. Unaware of the controversy that, in the role of minister, was raised with (right) sermons on the need to restore the credit and the reporting of conditions in which the Southern schools. Schools disastrous in the charts "scientific" in spite of international generosity with which end of the year is almost all promoted.
The news, just for the amazing trail of controversy on the preparation, permissiveness, the need for refresher courses, the backgrounds of the professors of the South, controversies that have seen battle on either front, most of intelligences Italian, was given in his column on laStampa.it by Flavia Amabile. The reaction of Internet users who have caught it is easy to imagine. One for all, that of Peppino Calabrese: 'A little dignity minister resigns! "You say, may be all right? The answer is the same blog of journalist. Where Gelmini admits. He explains his reasons.
a step back. It was 2001. Mariastella, the rising star of Forza Italy, Desenzano chairman of the City Council but not yet released as a Councillor for the Territory of the province of Brescia, Lombardy Regional Council, coordinator for the blue Lombardy, is a young and ambitious law graduate who faces one of the most delicate step: the state exam.
to become a lawyer, it is not enough graduation. Should join the roll of practicing attorneys, spent two years in a lawyer's office, "beating" the courts to gain experience, pick up gradually on a book of stamps clerks establish that actual attendance at hearings and ultimately overcome the fact 'examination held annually in the regional offices of the courts of appeals with a written test (three areas: criminal, civil and judicial practice) and a (higher) oral examination. A real obstacle. To which dashed hopes, on average, half of the competitors. The national average, however, and that is not true. Traditionally difficult in large part of the northern sites, with peaks of 94% rejected, the examination is in fact easy or even easier in some southern locations.
An example? Catanzaro. Where in the nineties the 'esamificio "gradually becomes an industry. The approximately 250 people in the five city hotels are blocked several months in advance, was bed & breakfast for pilgrims judicial re-open in mid-winter villages on the coast and sometimes propose a package "all-included": room, breakfast, dinner and went back to the minibus home exam. But on the eve of the turn of the scandal broke out Gelmini fake examination at the site of Appeals Catanzaro. Investigation of the judiciary: 2295 as they did on 2301 participants, to do exactly the same task even identical, in many cases with the same error ("flatly" instead of "precisely" with the 'p' original deleted) as if it was correct to Flight who was dictating the solution? Hot controversy. Commissioners in the trenches: "The candidates - President vows' court," lawyer Francesco Granata - had lost all self-control, they were like crazy. " "As it wants to go? - Says one of the competitors anonymously tricksters -. Enter a commissioner and says, "Write." It begins to dictate the theme. Bello and done. Slowly. To enable everyone to not lose the thread. "
The controversies have been dragging on for months and months to the point that the Berlusconi government sees no alternative: we must reform the system with which they do these tests. A couple of years and will be launched in 2003, for future sessions, a new rule: the exams will be judged by drawing lots, the fees so that the tasks can be corrected in Liguria, Puglia and Friuli in the Sardinian and so on. Reform sacrosanct. Already in the first year overturn established traditions: the aspiring lawyers Lombard for example, assessed by examination of Commissioners in Naples, will double their share of the eligible 30 to 69%. By contrast, examined at Brescia Messina will be cut by 34% Ancona reggini or 37%. As Catanzaro, record came after some 94% of promoted here is the breakdown: a fifth of those admitted earlier.
In those months of torment between 2000 and 2001, the Gelmini was placed at the point, explain to Flavia Amabile: "My family could not afford to keep me too long to study, my father was a farmer. I had to start working and then I had to pass the exam to obtain a license to practice. " So? "The feeling was that there was a ceiling of 30% which included the children of lawyers and other lucky few who managed to pass the exam every year. For others, nothing. There was a logic of caste, fortunately later modified because the system has been completely revised. " And so, "along with 30-40 other friends very disaffected by this situation, we decided to go for the examination in Reggio Calabria." The results of the session of 2000, moreover, were encouraging. Despite the scandal broke, the capital of Calabria had been admitted to the Italian record of oral: 93.4%. Three times that in Brescia in the Gelmini (31.7) and Milan (28.1), four times that in Ancona. Eligible Final: 87% of the initial members. Compared to 28% of Brescia, Milan 23.1%, 17% of Florence. Total: 806 eligible. Five and a half times those of New York: 144. How Marche, Umbria, Basilicata, Trentino, Abruzzo, Sardegna and Friuli Venezia Giulia combined.
short, The temptation was strong. Education Minister says: "Many kids were there and we decided to do it too." Moreover, he adds, she has "a long association with the South Part of my family has relatives in Cilento. Sure, it's almost five hundred kilometers from Reggio. But South always is. And the exam? How was the exam? "Absolutely smooth." Not strict, we say, not even in that session. Almost 57% admitted to oral. Twice that in Rome or Milan. Almost three times that in Brescia. Behind only the usual Catanzaro, Caltanissetta, Salerno. So did they all said Mariastella Gelmini. From today, after the discovery that she has slipped between the scoundrels who attempted the examination easy, however, will be a bit 'more difficult to rely on the recovery, the severity, the educational importance of a school that knows how to gain respect. All right battles. Absolutely right. But even those who share the choices on the apron, seven in the conduct, the imposition of civic education and even the need to play around with courage to the school from the south, can not but wonder: would not be less difficult battles even if engages those who had not sought the easy shortcut?

Gian Antonio Stella - September 4, 2008

Herpes And 38 Weeks Pregnant

lawyer Examinations 2007, tracks online in real time

tracks exam and solutions in real time on the Internet. To the series "I like to win easy?" the last barrier of propriety is shattered by mobile and handheld devices connected to the network present in the examination halls.
"An unprecedented scandal," "a fact unacceptable." What has happened in recent days could lead to invalidation of the state exam for lawyers. A very remote possibility, indeed, to actually prove that a leak will not be easy. But it is not the first time that the traces of tests come on line quickly, often within minutes of opening of sealed envelopes, or almost none of whom should know the contents. And it is precisely in those stale side then the tom tom to answer the questions and help those who are in the classroom and (well you never understand how) pass the solution.
The complaint this time comes by the PNA, the national association and practicing lawyers also asked the immediate resignation of the President of the Bar Council, the court stated that the Commissioners consideration. According to ANPA, in the days of the examination on the forum site www.praticanti.com , accessible with a free registration, the traces are filtered "almost simultaneously with the readings of the premises concerned." From that moment is playing on the same forum the dissemination of useful "in favor of certain candidates on the examination." The ANPA, then, seems to know just now. But already In 2005, our newspaper had carried out a survey which showed that now the thematic websites were a great inspiration to those who were in distress.
Two years ago, in fact, one of the many forums already at 10.23 gave someone a tip, "one of the tracks has the theme of sexual violence. They spend a few minutes and 10.29 will not only learn more details and we talk about sexual violence of the group but there's also information on the other tracks: medical liability, some say. At 10:38 comes the news official, "we wrote in our article," one of the tasks speaks of gang rape, there are those who reveal "the story of a murdered Desirè Leno ... so to speak." At 10 and 46 and another user is already ready with the details of the decision: to write and thank the other members. " In these two years in which the complaint had already been made the relevant bodies that could investigate and stop the strange phenomenon have not done anything. The very young, however, have sped up and took more and more familiar with what has become the new frontier of copying easy. 13/12/2007

Difference Between Ingrown Hair And Genital Wart

Consideration Catanzaro 1998: nothing process

It 'just that knows how many have obtained a license in 1998.
Call for a fine of 3 million and a half for candidates who copied.

Il Corriere della Sera has published Friday, March 23, 2001 the news of the request for a waiver of the penalty and trial examination of the candidates that took place in 1998 in Catanzaro. After months of investigations, prosecutors Roberta and Francesco Raffaele Zinno surrendered to the impossibility of proceeding against the 2,210 candidates who had copied during an examination as to the legal profession of Catanzaro.I two judges have thus asked the head of the investigating magistrate, Antonio Baudi, to sign a penal order to pay a fine of 3 million and a half pounds. The request stems from an awareness of the courts that a trial of 2,210 defendants, with all series of appeals and objections arising, hardly could be accomplished without falling into prescription. Not to spoil all the investigations and the work of the prosecution and the Guardia di Finanza, the prosecutors have decided to resort to criminal order: so even if you do not appear before the judge, defendants, who have since been promoted in mass on 'examination in 1998, should at least pay a fine.

Clean Your Refurbished Tub

Examination 2004, Catanzaro is a paradise lost

After the scandal, examination papers elsewhere in the South promoted the collapse of those who resort to the expedient to make the Tar oral in their district

It took a life, under Vesuvius, to correct the tasks carried out in mid-December of 2004 by 3,078 young people in the judicial district of Milan. In June, when the parallel committee Ambrogina had already done to examine the evidence of 3428 (nearly four hundred more) Campania, they were still there, bowing to labor on a huge pile of documents to consider. Till, extending in an extension, have finished the job in mid-September. "We?", Asked to be on. "We" have to be answered down. And the armored truck load of envelopes with the written tests evaluated in Milan has left for the Gulf to exchange finally the results. Not at all, behind closed doors, "Desolatissimi, but today is the feast of San Gennaro." Stop.
Rest. Drain. Load. And return. The truck will arrive in Milan this morning, nine months after "conception" of the subjects, while oral examinations in the rest of Italy are under way for weeks. But you already know, we said, how it went: 2137 welcome to the second round. Record of all time.
With an increase of 39.35%. All phenomena. While on the other side must have been a wave of pacifiers: candidates last year, examined the city bell, had passed the written in 68.64% of cases. This time, the Fair moved from Posillipo Milanese, came out badly: 55% of mouth. With an increase of 23% rejected. Here the theme is reversed: it can be so poor? Or rather, we insist, is something rotten in the system? "I do not do tests anymore," replies the lawyer Ferruccio Zuccaro Varese, Milan was that the committee chairman.
Too many variables. A lottery games without the grimace: where you fall you fall. A sub-committee of Naples, the VI, has promoted 94% of its 300 candidates. One of Milan, the thirteenth, it was voted down 79.1%. It is not over, Zuccaro polemic laughs: "At oral each sub-committee should prepare every morning a number of questions to the candidates are equal to three of the candidates themselves. After the aspiring lawyer should pull out its two questions, and we should question him only on those. A delirium. But you can really evaluate so, people? ". And all because? "Because this is a state that does not trust even himself. What, then ... Might as well go back to the quiz. "
sure. The sarannoavvocati.it forum hosted yesterday a letter signed "asshole": "Hello everyone, I just passed the mouth with a good recommendation. What Goduria ... ass to all those who have not passed the writing ... rotten on the books. We know that the world is made to scale, but some people take the elevator ...».
not enough, true to the motto "the law passed, find the loophole," some have already discovered how to break the deadlock. And the Tar Italy are beginning to be half-submerged the remedies of those who were not admitted. In a nutshell: if you use the administrative courts can not legally enter into the details of your written test. However, they can accept your protests and take them on a formal defect subject to the oral. Orally do not further away but in your natural home: Naples, Catania, Torino, Campobasso ... Where words can come into play those external variables that the news decided by Roberto Castelli after the scandal of rigged tests of Catanzaro wanted to eliminate. And once you passed the oral, really someone will redo the writings? Of course, the final table of the promoted and rejected that we publish is amazing. The Trentino examined earn Caltanissetta 20 points, the Ligurian Salerno 26, the Tuscan Catanzaro 38, Marches to Reggio Calabria 15 ... Elsewhere it is rather a massacre: the Brescia Messina examined undergo mowing by 34% to 26% of Basilicata in Perugia, the Umbrian Campobasso of 38% and 37% in Ancona, Reggio Calabria, Salerno to Messina to 41%. For an overall decrease in Italy (no data of Milan and Naples, too fresh) by almost 23%.
The real carnage, however, is in Catanzaro. It was a paradise for those who wanted to pass the exam. There were lawyers who accepted crowds of young men eager to do the apprenticeship of two years there and sometimes even their fornivan address for the residence. Registrars that you signed & Attendance snobbish. Hotels and resorts on the coast that we have offered the formula "all inclusive (meals, accommodation and bus to and from exam site). Night-club that 'Lawyers Party. " But above all there was an astounding rate of promotions. A year went the exact opposite of Milan: 94% of pipes under the Blessed Virgin, 94% promoted there.
Until, of course, exaggerated. And in the summer of 2000 emerged from a survey that examined the participants well in December 1997 to 2301 2295 (all except 6) were copied. Word for word. The local bar association, before the scandal, the newspapers screamed against the North: 'Destructive ferocity. " The Corriere della Sera published the confidences of a candidate: "How is it that way? Enter a commissioner and says, "Write." It begins to dictate, slowly. " Fear? But no: "There can not do anything. There are too many. "
He was right. Years of investigation and controversy, then prescription for everyone. The publicity of the scandal (what a shame ...) had even increased arrivals. And the writings of December 2003, the last before the system change with the hijacking in the north of the issues to be considered, candidates were dell'Avvocatificio Catanzaro 3261 (one thousand more than before the scandal) and welcome 2768. How Veneto, Piedmont, Val d'Aosta, Umbria, Liguria, Tuscany and Marche combined. Five times more than allowed (609) this year with the tasks examined in Florence. "Ferocity destructive"? Corriere della
SeraGian Antonio Stella21 September 2005

Will Pulpitis Go Away

DL May 21, 2003, No 112

DECREE-LAW May 21, 2003, No 112 (coordinated and amended by Law No 180/2003 conversion)
(published in Official Gazette No. 117 of May 22, 2003 eripubblicato in the Official Gazette No. 167 of July 21, 2003)
URGENT CHANGES TO THE RULES OF THE QUALIFICATION TESTS LEGAL PROFESSION

The President of the Republic
Having regard to Articles 77 and 87 of Constitution;
Considering the extraordinary need and urgency to amend the provisions relating to the conduct of the practice and forensic examination of competency to the legal profession, in order to rationalize the conduct and content of the examination and to avoid, also, since the next session, a continuation of steady and significant heterogeneity between the percentages promoted in the various examination centers;
Given the decision of the Council of Ministers, adopted at its meeting on May 16, 2003;
On the proposal of the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice, in consultation with the Minister of Economy and Finance, issued the following
Decree-Law: Article 1
.
Amendment to Article 9 of the Rules of the decree of the President of the Republic April 10, 1990, No 101

1. Article 9 of the Rules of the decree of the President of the Republic April 10, 1990, No 101, is replaced by the following:
"Art 9 (certificate of practical completion).
1. The certificate of practice made under Article 10 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, issued by the Bar Council is the place where the practitioner has done most of the practice or, in the event of a tie, the place where the practice was initiated. The certificate of practical tasks can not be issued more than once.
2. In case of transfer of the practitioner, the board sending the order certifying the case on previous assessment periods.
3. The certificate referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 identifies the Court of Appeal at which the student can take the exams as a lawyer. "
1. ca. "Until December 31, 2003, the certificate referred to in Article 9 of the Rules of the decree of the President of the Republic April 10, 1990, No 101, as substituted by paragraph 1 of this Article shall be issued by the Bar Council in the place where the practitioner appears to be writing the date of entry into force of this decree. "
Article 1-bis.
Amendment to Article 22 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36

1. Article 22 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, is replaced by the following:
"Art 22.
1. The bar exam shall take place simultaneously at each Court of Appeal.
2. The themes for each test are given by the Minister of Justice.
3. By decree of the Minister of Justice, to be issued not later than thirty days from the publication of the decree containing the notice of review, the committee was appointed consisting of five members and five alternates, of whom two members and two alternate members are lawyers, enrolled for at least twelve years in the Lawyers, two members and two alternate members are judges, with qualifications not less than Magistrate Court of Appeal, one member and one alternate are full or associate professor of law at a university in the Republic, or at a tertiary institution . The committee based at the Ministry of Justice. For the functions of the Secretary, the Minister shall appoint an employee of the Administration C belonging to the administrative staff, as outlined by the national collective agreement for workers at the Ministries of February 16, 1999.
4. By the same decree referred to in paragraph 3, at each place of the Court of Appeal, was appointed a subcommittee having identical composition to the Committee referred to in that subsection 3.
5. The Minister of Justice appoints the committee and each subcommittee chairman and the vice-ons lawyers. the deputies involved in the committee and subcommittees in place of any member.
6. The lawyers committee members and subcommittees are appointed by the Bar Council on a joint councils of each district, ensuring the presence in each subcommittee, in annual rotation, at least one lawyer for every order of the district council. Can not be appointed lawyers who are members of the councils or representatives of National Welfare and forensic assistance. The lawyers committee members and subcommittees are not eligible for their respective councils and representatives of the office of National Welfare and forensic assistance to the elections held immediately following the assignment. Magistrates are appointed under the guidance provided by the presidents of courts of appeal.
7. If the number of candidates who have submitted applications for admission exceed three hundred units in each Court of Appeals, by decree of the Minister of Justice to be issued before completion of the written tests are named more subcommittees, each consisting of a number of components equal to that of the subcommittee appointed under subsection 4 and a secretary.
8. Each subcommittee can not be assigned a number of candidates more than three hundred.
9. The commission established by the Ministry of Justice has described the criteria for evaluation of written papers and oral tests, and the chairman shall inform the subcommittees. The committee is still required to provide the following evaluation criteria: a.
clear, logical and methodological rigor of exposure;
b. concrete demonstration of the ability to solve specific legal problems;
c. demonstration of knowledge of the theoretical foundations of legal treaties;
d. demonstrate an understanding of any profiles of interdisciplinarity;
e. regarding the judicial act, demonstration of mastery of persuasion techniques.

10. Where procedural irregularities have been detected, the sub-committee to communicate the measures taken, which shall be used for the detection of the definition of the defensive line of the Administration in the litigation. "
2. The provisions in the second and third sentence of paragraph 6 of Article 22 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as substituted by paragraph 1 of this article, apply with respect to the committee and subcommittees to be appointed after the date of entry into force of this decree.
Article 1-c.
Amendment to Article 16 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37

1. Article 16, first paragraph, of the Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, the words, "the jury" shall be replaced by "the subcommittee set up under Article 22, paragraph 4, of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended. "
Article 2.
Changes Article 15 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37
01. Article 15 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, the third paragraph is deleted.
02. Article 15, fourth paragraph, of the Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, the word "commission" shall be replaced by "sub".
1. "Article 15 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, after the fourth paragraph shall be inserted the following:
"By further decree, the Minister of Justice shall determine, by lot, the matching between the identified candidates in accordance with Article 9, paragraph 3 of the Rules of the decree of President Republic of April 10, 1990, No 101, as amended, and the headquarters of the Court of Appeal takes place where the correction of written assignments.
The draw of the preceding paragraph shall be made after grouping the locations of the Court of Appeal that have a number of applications it sufficiently homogeneous to ensure the adequacy between the composition of the subcommittees and the number of examination candidates each site.
The oral exam takes place in the same place of the written test ".
Article 3.
Amendments to Article 23 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, n. 37
1. Article 23 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No. 37, are prefixed the following paragraphs:
"Once all the transactions referred to in Article 22, the chairman of the subcommittee referred to in Article 22, paragraph 4, of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended, shall notify the President of the Court of Appeal which, even through the person in charge, ordered the transfer of the envelopes containing the papers prepared by candidates for the Court of Appeal identified pursuant to Article 15, paragraphs fourth and fifth, with which the correction must be made by means of delivery to the inspector of the prison service specifically delegated by the Chief the department of the penitentiary.
The President of the Court of Appeal identified pursuant to Article 15, fourth and fifth paragraphs, in which the correction must be made, received, even through the person in charge, the envelopes containing the papers and ordering the delivery to Chairmen of subcommittees, which attested the proper receipt of the envelopes, have the start of operations review of the documents referred to therein.
upon the completion of correction of entries, the President of the Court of Appeal identified pursuant to Article 15, fourth and fifth paragraphs, receives the chairmen of the subcommittees under Article 22, paragraph 4, of Royal Decree Law of 27 November 1933 No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended, the envelopes containing the papers, the minutes show the correction operations and the opinions expressed, and arrange for the transfer to the Court of Appeal for membership of the candidates, which takes place at the oral examination. The transfer is made in the manner specified in the preceding paragraphs. "
Article 4.
Amendments to Article 21 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No
37 (Deleted) Article 5
.
Amendments to Article 17-bis of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37
1. Article 17-bis, paragraph 3, letter a) of the Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, after the words "Church law" shall be added the following: "and European law."
Article 5-bis.
standard coordination

1. Unless otherwise provided in this Ordinance and except in cases of revocation, by incompatibility in the Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, and the Royal Decree of 22 January 1934 No 37, the reference to the examination board means the Subcommittee examined. "
Article 6. Amendments to Article
22 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578
(Deleted) Article 6-bis
.
exam to practice law in the Court of Appeal of Trento

1. For the exam to practice law in the Court of Appeal of Trento, Bolzano branch section shall not apply to Articles 2 and 3 of this decree. Remain subject to the provisions of Articles 99 and 100 of the Consolidated Law on constitutional special status for the Trentino-Alto Adige, in the decree of the President of the Republic August 31, 1972, No 670, and the Decree of the President July 15, 1988, No 574, for the composition of the Subcommittee in Article 22, paragraph 4, of Royal Decree Law of 27 November 1933 No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended by Article 1-bis of this decree.
Article 6-b. Final provisions


1. The provisions of Articles 1-a, 1-b, 2, 3, 5-bis-bis and 6 do not apply to the first examination session following the date of entry into force of this decree.
2. They can not be assigned to committee members and subcommittees lawyers who are members of the councils or representatives of National Welfare and forensic assistance. Lawyers components committee and subcommittees are not eligible for their respective councils and representatives of the office of National Welfare and forensic assistance to the elections held immediately following the assignment. Magistrates are appointed under the instructions given by the presidents of courts of appeal. "
Section 7.
standard coverage
1. For the operation of the Committee referred to in Article 1-A has authorized the expenditure of € 9,264 per year starting in 2004.
1. ca. For transactions relating to the submission of the documents referred to in Article 3 shall be eligible for expenditure of € 34,144 per year with effect since 2004.
1. ter. Obligations under this Article, equal to € 43,408 per year starting in 2004, accounted for by corresponding reduction of the projections for the years 2004 and 2005 in appropriations for the 2003-2005 three-year budget, in unit forecast basic current account "Special Fund" of the budget of the Ministry of Economy and Finance for the year 2003, making partial use of the provision for the Ministry of Justice.
2. The Minister of Economy and Finance is authorized to make by decree, the necessary budget changes.
Article 8.

Entry into force 1. This Decree shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Gazette of the Italian Republic and will be presented to both Houses for the conversion into law.
This decree, bearing the seal of the State, will be included in the official collection of normative acts of the Italian Republic. shall be obligatory for all to observe and enforce them.

2 Seater Mini Sandrail Plans

L. February 24, 1997, No 27

LAW February 24, 1997, No 27 (OJ No 048, 27/02/1997) ELIMINATION OF DAWN OF ATTORNEYS AND LEGAL RULES GOVERNING LAWYER.
Preamble
CAMERA Of Deputies and the Senate have approved;
THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC
PROMULGATES
the following law: Article 1
. Suppression of the register
1. The roll of solicitors is deleted.
Article 2. Entry to the Bar
1. The solicitors, on the date of entry into force of this Act, shall be entered in the relevant register office are entered in the register of lawyers.
2. Seniority for all purposes from the date of registration as solicitors.
3. Date of entry into force of this Act, the qualifications for registration as the barristers second the provisions of Royal Decree Law of 27 November 1933 No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended, and the Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, as amended, allowing the entry to the Bar.
4. Remain subject to the provisions of law governing the registration and enrollment to the Bar for the cases before the Supreme Court.
Article 3. Replacing the term "solicitor"
1. The term "solicitor" contained in existing legislation, will be substituted with the word "lawyer".
Article 4. Deadlines relating to enrollment to plead before the court of cassation
1. The exercise period of the legal profession for inclusion in the special need for advocacy before the Supreme Court and other superior courts pursuant to Article 33, second paragraph, of Royal Decree Law of 27 November 1933 n . 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended, is twelve years.
2. For those who on the date of entry into force of this Act shall be registered as solicitors or to the Bar, shall be deemed, for the period referred to in paragraph 1, including the exercise period of the procuratore.Tuttavia profession, if later, the term referred to in paragraph 1 shall be reduced to seven years and runs from the entry to the Bar for those who have obtained membership of that register by passing the examination provided for by 'Article 28 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36.
3. The exercise period of the legal profession under Article 3 of Law 28 May 1936, No 1003, for admission to the special enrollment has increased to five years. For those who, at the date of entry into force of this Law shall be entered in the register of solicitors or the Bar for less than one year, the profession of attorney shall be deemed, for the period referred to in the previous period, equivalent to the profession of those who avvocato.Per the date of entry into force of this law are members of the Bar, the deadline for admission to the remains of one year from the entry to that register.
Article 5. Rules concerning the residency and the coordination rules
1. Article 17, first paragraph, No. 7, Royal Decree Law of November 27, 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, reads as follows: "7 reside in the district court in whose register the registration is requested. "
2. The period referred to in Article 14, first paragraph, number 6 of the Law 6 December 1971, n. 1034, increased to eight years.
3. In the letter e) of the first paragraph of Article 1 of the Law of 20 June 1955, n. 519, the words "not less than one year" are replaced by "not less than six years."
Article 6. Repeal of incompatible standards
1. Are hereby repealed to Articles 2, first paragraph, 5, 6, 27, 28 and 29 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended, and Articles 31, 32, 33 and 34 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, as amended.
2. It also repealed any other provision of law or regulations inconsistent with the provisions of this Act.
Section 7. Entry into force
1. This Act comes into force on the day following its publication in the Official Gazette italiana.La this Law, bearing the seal of the state, will be included in the official collection of normative acts of the Italian republic. It is mandatory for all to observe and enforce it as law of the state.
Legislative
Legislative Chamber of Deputies (Act No. 374): presented Mr. Cesetti May 9, 1996. Assigned to the Second Committee (justice), in a reporting, July 16, 1996, with the advice of the committees, I xi. Examined by Commission II, in a reporting, August 1, 11 and 12 September 1996. Re-assigned to the Second Commission, during the legislative, September 26, 1996. Examined by Commission II, in the legislative, and approved September 26, 1996 in a unified text with the Act No. 875 (Hon Pasetto). Senate of the Republic (Act No. 1389): awarded to the second committee (Justice), during the deliberation, October 3, 1996, with the opinions of the committees first and fifth. Examined by the second committee on October 16, 4 and 5 December 1996 and approved with amendments on December 10 1996 in a unified text with the Act No. 1371 (Sen. Battle). Chamber of Deputies (Act No. 374 / b) assigned to the Second Committee (justice), in a reporting, December 19, 1996, with the opinion of the i. Examined by Commission II, during the referral, 7 and 8 January 1997. Re-assigned to the Second Commission, during the legislative, February 6, 1997. Examined by Commission II, in the legislative, and approved February 11, 1997. Date
In Rome, this day of 24 February 1997ScalfaroProdi, Prime MinistriVisto, The Keeper: Flick

Does Cvs Have Colloidal Silver

DPR 10 April 1990, No 101

DECREE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC April 10, 1990, No 101 (OJ No 102 of 05.04.1990) REGULATION ON THE PRACTICE OF FORENSIC EXAMINATION FOR ADMISSION solicitor.
Preamble
THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC
VISA L 'ART. LAW OF THE ROYAL DECREE 18-November 27, 1933, No. 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No. 36;
VISA L 'ART. 2 of the Law June 27, 1988, No. 242;
VISA L 'ART. 17 SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE LAW August 23, 1988, No. 400;
HEARD THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF FORENSIC;
HEARING THE OPINION OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE, issued in GENERAL November 16, 1989;
VIEW THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS, at its meeting on March 23, 1990;
ON THE PROPOSAL OF THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE;

ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1
.
a mode of practice. The law practice must be conducted with diligence, care, dignity, loyalty and confidentiality.
2. It takes place primarily at the office and under the supervision of a solicitor and involves the completion of activities in the profession.
3. The frequency of the study can be replaced, for a period not exceeding one year, the frequency of one of the courses provided by post-graduate students' art. 18 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, and governed in accordance with art. 2.
4. Is integration of forensic practice, contextual to its normal course in the manner of this Article, the frequency of vocational training schools established in accordance with art. 3.
Article 2. Postgraduate courses
1. The post-graduate courses in art. 1, third paragraph, they address theoretical and practical and its programs must comply with the provisions of art. 3, third paragraph.
Article 3. Training schools
1. The councils may establish vocational training schools whose attendance, pursuant to art. 1, fourth paragraph, it integrates the forensic practice. The councils of the district court of appeal may establish, of understanding, training uniform for all or part of orders of each district.
2. Courses at schools in the first paragraph are required as part of a two-year period and must have an address theoretical and practical, which includes the study of ethics and legislation on social security lawyer.
3. The course syllabus must contain an adequate number of exercises interdisciplinary examination of all issues listed in the 'art. 3 of Act June 27, 1988, No 242, conducted by seasoned professionals in specific operational areas and significant in the study, analysis and treatment by practitioners under the guidance of teachers of practical cases in civil, criminal and administrative. The course syllabus must be previously approved by the National Bar Council.
Article 4. Compliance councils of
1. The councils ensure and promote the availability of members to receive in their studies, law graduates wishing to pursue the forensic training and provide appropriate guidance to applicants who request them.
2. The lawyers and attorneys qualified for at least two years are required, within the limits of its ability, to welcome in their study, the practitioners, educating them and preparing them to practice, including its compliance with the principles of ethics for lawyers.
3 . It is the responsibility of councils monitor the agreed course of training by practicing attorneys in the manner prescribed by this Regulation, and the means deemed appropriate.
Article 5.
a special register. The special register of practitioners, referred to 'art. Royal Decree Law 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, contains, in addition to the full identity of the members and the date of commencement of practice, an indication of all transfers, interruptions, deletions, and vocational studies in which the practice is exercised, with any changes.
2. The special registration measure is immediately communicated by the council, even at the professional whose study the practice must be carried out.
3. The period of work done in the studio of a professional than was previously indicated to the council, without the prior written notice to the board, is not found to be effective for the completion of the process itself and the issue of the certificate under 's art. 10 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37.
Article 6. Booklet for the practice
1. Practitioners are not enabled prosecutors to plead before the magistrate must hold a special booklet, issued numbered, previously endorsed by the President of the Bar or his delegate, which must record:
A) hearings where the practitioner has assisted with the names of the role and number of processes; assistance can not be less than twenty hearings for each semester, with the exception of those covered by mere reference;
B) the pleadings or court related activities most relevant to the preparation and drafting that have participated, with an indication of their subject;
C) the legal issues of interest to the treatment of which have assisted or cooperated.
2. The owner of the practice must be presented to the Board order at the end of each semester, with the notation of professional practice at the study of which has been carried out confirming the accuracy of the information contained herein.
3. The Bar Council has the power to determine the veracity of the records contained in the booklet in the manner deemed most appropriate.
Section 7. Performed after the first year of practice
1. After the first year of practice, practitioners should explain to the committee of prosecutors, in a special report, the activities listed in the booklet of the practical and ethical nature of the problems also dealt with during that period.
2. At the end of which the first paragraph, practitioners must deposit with the Board order the book of practice which they held.
3. The Bar Council shall carry out appropriate investigations on the statements of the practitioner and has the power to invite him to interview for any further guidance on the completion of training.
Article 8. Practitioners entitled to practice
1. Practitioners attorneys entitled to practice before the magistrate pursuant to 'art. A law July 24, 1985, No 406, where, after the first year of training, they wanted to continue the practice outside the office of a prosecutor must:
A) communicate their understanding with the association in the special register which shall be entered;
B) hold and compile the book of practice, in art. 6 of this Regulation, the records concerning the activity;
C) treat at least twenty-five new cases per year, including at least five criminal offenses, including defenders of trust, or five cases civil actions;
D) present at the end of each semester the book of practice with the association, which can determine the veracity of the records in the manner deemed most appropriate.
Article 9. Certificate of completion of the practice
1. The certificate of practical tasks set out in 'art. 10 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, which is issued by the Bar Council performed the expected findings on the last full semester of activity of the practitioner attorney.
2. In case of transfer of the practitioner, the board sending the order certifying the case on previous semesters and assessment, where the required two years of practice is complete, issue the certificate of practical tasks.
3. The certificate referred to in the first and second paragraphs of the appellate court determines at which the student can take exams of solicitor.
Article 10. Replacing the earlier rules
1. The rules provided for in this Regulation replace those laid down in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 71 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, relating to the the conduct of forensic practice.
Article 11. First application
1. For practicing attorneys, on the date of entry into force of this Regulation, must be included in the special register and have completed a period of practice below the prescribed period, the provisions of this Regulation shall apply only to the remainder.
2. If the required two years of practice has been completed, the date referred to in the first paragraph, provisions are already in vigore.Il This decree, bearing the seal of the state, will be included in the official collection of normative acts of the Italian republic. It is mandatory for all to observe and enforce them.
Given in Rome, Addi 1990CossigaAndreotti April 10, Prime MinistriVassalli, Minister of GiustiziaVisto, The Keeper: VassalliRegistrato The Court of Auditors on 27 April 1990Atti Government, Register No. 80, Sheet No 14

Some Good Program Ideas For Seniors

L. April 20, 1989, No 142

LAW April 20, 1989, No 142 (OJ No 096, 26/04/1989)
AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF THE TESTS OF ATTORNEY AND LEGAL ADVOCATE.

Preamble
THE CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES AND THE SENATE HAVE APPROVED OF THE REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC

PROMULGATES
the following law: Article 1
.
1. The fourth paragraph of 'Article 19 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, converted, with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36 is replaced by the following: exams may involve practitioners who have completed the required practice before the 10th day of November. "
Article 2.
1. The first paragraph of 'Article 22 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36 recently replaced by an Act of June 27, 1988, No 242, is replaced by the following: 1. Solicitor of the exams take place in December of each year in the courts of appeal. "
Article 3.
1. The fourth paragraph of 'Article 16 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, is replaced by the following: "Notwithstanding the fourth paragraph of 'Article 19 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, applicants can submit a certificate referred to in paragraph 2 of the first paragraph of this article after the deadline for the submission of the application, but no later than twenty days prior to the date fixed for the beginning of the written tests.
Article 4.
1. In the letter a) of the third paragraph of Article 17-bis of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, introduced by section 3 of Act June 27, 1988, No 242, after the words "relating to five subjects," are inserted the following: "including at least one of procedural law."
Article 5.
1. In the Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, as amended by Act June 27, 1988, No 242, the first paragraph of Article 34 is replaced by the following: "we look to the conduct of examinations, as applicable, the provisions of Articles 19,20,21,22,23, first and third paragraphs, 24 and 25. Each Commissioner has ten points for each written test and oral test for each subject, and declares how many points will be assigned to the candidate. The sum of points assigned to it, divided by the number of those voting, is the score for each written examination for each subject and test orale.Sono admitted to the oral exam candidates who have the requisite qualifications in all the written tests, showing at least a score of six out of ten in each written examination, as well as those who, having obtained not less than five points in one of the tests, have achieved in other an average of eight punti.La oral examination is public and should last no less than forty-five and not more than sixty minutes for each candidate. After the test each candidate a vote and the secretary shall record the results in minutes, separately for each materia.I candidates must take the oral test in the order that is set by the President. After the first appeal proceed immediately to the second. The candidate not to appear for the first nor the second loses the right to appeal before it. They declared fit those who have completed at least six-tenths of points in each subject of the oral examination. "
Article 6.
1. This Act comes into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of repubblica.La this Law, bearing the seal of the state, will be included in the official collection of normative acts of the Italian republic. It is mandatory for all to observe and enforce it as law of the state.
Legislative
Legislative Senate (Act No. 1394): presented by sen. And other edge of November 9, 1988. Assigned to Second Board (Justice), during the deliberation, 15 November 1988, with the opinion of the first. Examined by the Second Board and approved November 29, 1988. Chamber of Deputies (Act No. 3436) assigned to the Second Committee (justice), in the legislative, December 21, 1988, with the opinion of the first. Examined by the Second Board January 31, 1989, 8, 15 February 1989 and approved with amendments on March 1, 1989. Senate of the Republic (Act No. 1394-b) assigned to the Second Committee (Justice), during the deliberation on 8 March 1989, with the opinion of the first. Examined by the Second Board and approved April 5, 1989. Date
In Rome, this day April 20 1989CossigaDe Mita, the Prime MinistriVisto, The Keeper: Vassalli

Monday, March 30, 2009

How To Trade With Vba For Mac

L. June 27, 1988, No 242

LAW June 27, 1988, No 242 (OJ No 153, 01/07/1988) CHANGES TO THE RULES OF TESTS solicitor.
Preamble
THE CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES AND THE SENATE HAVE APPROVED OF THE REPUBLIC, THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC

PROMULGATES
the following law:
ART. 1.
1. L 'article 22 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, No. 5 and amended by article 1 of the Law of March 23, 1940, No 254, reads as follows: "Art. 22. - 1. Solicitor of the exams take place in July of each year of the Courts of appello.2. The themes for each written examination are given by the Minister of giustizia.3. The exam boards are appointed by the Minister of Justice and each is composed of five members and five alternates, of whom two members and two alternate members are lawyers, members of at least eight years to an order of the District Court of Appeals seat examination, two members and two alternates are judges of the same district, with qualifications not less than that of adviser to the court of appeal, one member and one alternate are full or associate professor of law at a university in the republic, or at any school superiore.4. The advocates who are examining boards are appointed by the National Council of the Bar, on a joint councils of each district, ensuring the presence in each committee, in annual rotation, at least one lawyer for every order of the district council . The Minister of Justice appoints all examining board for the president and the vice-ons avvocati.5. The deputies involved in the committee to replace any member effettivo.6. If the number of applicants who have submitted applications for admission exceed two hundred and fifty units, boards of examiners may be supplemented by a decree of the Minister of Justice, to be issued before completion of the written tests, a number of alternate members with the same requirements for the members to allow the only remaining president, the division into subcommittees, each consisting of a number of components equal to the original committee and a secretary. Each of the subcommittees can not be allocated a number of candidates exceeds two hundred and fifty. "
Article 2.
1. All 'Article 2 of Law July 24, 1985, No 406, is adding the following paragraph: "The Minister of Justice, after consulting the National Bar Association, shall determine, by decree, how to the completion of the case and to ascertain its actual conduct. "
Article 3.
1. After the 'Article 17 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, is added as follows: "Art. 17-bis. - 1. The written tests are three. They are carried out on the issues raised by the Minister of Justice and relate to: a) preparing a reasoned opinion, to choose between two matters regulated by the Civil Code, b) draw up a reasoned opinion, to be chosen between two issues regulated by the Penal Code; c) the establishment of a judicial act which posits knowledge of substantive law and procedural law, on a question proposed by the candidate on choice between private law, criminal law and the right amministrativo.2. For each component of each written examination boards has 10 merit points, the oral test are open to candidates who have achieved in the three written tests, an overall score of at least 90 points and a minimum score of 30 points for at least two prove.3. The oral examinations are to: a) in the discussion, after a brief explanation of the written tests, short questions relating to five subjects, chosen in advance by the candidate from among the following: constitutional law, civil law, commercial law, employment law, criminal law administrative law, tax law, procedural law, procedural law criminal law, private international law, ecclesiastical law, b) in the proof of knowledge of the bar and the rights and obligations of the lawyer .4. For the oral exam every member of the commission has 10 merit points for each of the matters being considered by .5. Are considered suitable candidates who receive an overall score for the oral exams at least 180 points and a minimum score of 30 points for at least five tests. "
Article 4.
1. In the first paragraph of 'Article 21 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, after the words "refer to the codes," are added to the following: "even commented exclusively to the case."
Article 5.
1. L 'article 22 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, reads as follows: "Art. 22. - 1. The candidate will be delivered in each of three days to examine two envelopes of the same color, a big equipped with a coupon serial number, serial number corresponding to the same list of candidates admitted to the examination, and one containing a small bianco.2 card. The candidate, having developed the theme, with no subscription or affix another sign, put the sheet or sheets in large envelope, which also makes the small envelope, sealed, containing the white paper where he stated his name, surname, date of birth and residence, and the delivery All the President or his / her place. The latter, after verifying that the number of large envelope marked on the coupon matches the serial number of the applicant shall affix his signature across the envelope in the same way that ruins including its flap, and, on the edges glued the imprint in the wax seal of commissione.3. All envelopes containing the work is entrusted, at the end of each test, the Secretary, after collecting them in one or more parcels signed out by one of the members of the committee, and sealed in wax with the imprint of the seal of the Board .4. In the days immediately following the last test and at the hour indicated by the Chairman, the Committee in plenary session, in the presence of at least five persons nominated by the President and promptly informed, finds that the seals and signatures, he opened the parcel containing the envelopes with the work brings together the three envelopes with their respective coupons the same number and, after removing the coupons, the largest closed in a single envelope, which is affixed a serial number only when it is completed the regrouping for all the envelopes with the work, taking care to stir envelopes themselves before affixing the predicted number progressivo.5. All envelopes shall be duly numbered and sealed with a bow collected in the same manner as in secondo.6 paragraph. Of all the transactions referred to in the preceding paragraphs, as well as everything that happens during the course of the tests, Minutes shall be signed by the Chairman or his representative and the segretario.7. The review of the work contained in three bags grouped under the fourth paragraph is accomplished together. "
Article 6.
1. The first two paragraphs of 'Article 23 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, are replaced by the following: "The commission, in the case of division into sub-committees, performs the review of written work in the shortest time and in any case not later than six months after the conclusion of the evidence: an extension of that deadline may be placed once, and in any event not later than ninety days, by order of the President of the Court of Appeal, the circumstances are exceptional and duly accertati.La committee assigns a score to each of the three papers grouped according to Article 22, fourth paragraph, after reading all three, with the rules laid down in Article 17-bis. "
Section 7.
1. The fourth paragraph of 'Article 25 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, is replaced by the following: the interval between the filing of the list of allowed and the start of oral evidence can not be less than one month nor more than two. "
Article 8.
1. In the second paragraph of 'Article 26 of the Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37, the words "in accordance with the standards prescribed in Art. 27 "are replaced by" under the rules set out in Article 17-bis. "
Article 9.
1. Are hereby repealed Article 18, first and second paragraphs, Article 25, first and second paragraphs, el 'Article 27, first and second paragraphs of the Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37.
Article 10.
1. In the second paragraph of 'Article 8 of the Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, and replaced by Article 1 of Law July 24, 1985, No 406, the words "four years" shall replaced by "six years".
Article 11.
1. The provisions of this Act shall apply to the exam session solicitor in July 1989.
2. For the examination session for the year 1988 were also admitted to hearing the candidates, having obtained not less than five points in the written tests have earned in the other no less than seven points.
Article 12.
1. This Act comes into force on the day following its publication in the Gazette ufficiale.La this Law, bearing the seal of the state, will be included in the official collection of normative acts of the Italian republic. It is mandatory for all to observe and enforced as state law.
Legislative
Legislative Chamber of Deputies (Act No. 1889): presented by the Minister of Justice (vassals) November 14, 1987. Assigned to the Second Committee (justice), in a reporting, December 2, 1987, with the opinion of the v. Examined by Commission II, in a reporting, December 2, 1987. Re-assigned to the Second Commission, during the legislative, March 9, 1988. Examined by Commission II, in the legislative, 26, 28 April 1988, May 10, 1988 and approved May 17, 1988. Senate of the Republic (Act No. 1050): assigned to the Second Committee (Justice), during the deliberation, June 3, 1988, with the opinions of committees first and fifth. Examined by the committee on the second nine, and approved June 15, 1988 June 16, 1988.
Given in Rome, this day of June 27 1988CossigaDe Mita, the Prime MinistriVassalli, Minister of GiustiziaVisto, The Keeper: Vassalli

Milena Velba And/or Nadine Jansen

L. July 24, 1985, No 406

L. July 24, 1985, No 406 (OJ 13.8.1985, n. 190) - Changes to the rules of the cases before [the magistrate] (1) and examinations for the profession of lawyer (2)
(1) Under ' art. 244 of Legislative Decree no. 51/1998, which established the single-judge court, the original reference to the magistrate "has no more raison d'etre. (2) The term "solicitor" means either deleted or replaced with "lawyer" pursuant to art. 3 L. 02/24/1997 No 27.
1. - (1).
(1) Inserted in the text of art. 8 RDL 11/27/1933 No 1578.
2. - The period of practice under Article 17, No 5 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, enacted into law with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended, for admission to a lawyer (1), can not be shorter than two years. Minister of Justice, after consulting the Bar Council, shall determine, by decree, the procedures for the completion of the case and to ascertain their actual performance (2).
(1) The term "solicitor" means either deleted or replaced with "lawyer" pursuant to art. 3 L. 02/24/1997 No 27. (2) Paragraph added by Article. 2 L 06/27/1988 No 242 (Changes to the rules of solicitor of the exams).
3 .- The trainee lawyers (1) support the bar exam (1) at the Court of Appeal in whose district they are registered to practice (1).
(1) The term "solicitor" means either deleted or replaced with "lawyer" pursuant to art. 3 L. 02/24/1997 No 27. (2) Paragraph 2, already declared unconstitutional (Constitutional Court 224/1993), was repealed by Law 03/04/1991 No 67.
4. - (1).
(1) Replace, unified, Articles. 5 and 6 of Royal Decree 1578/1933 subsequently repealed by Law 27/1997.
5. - Those who, on the date of entry into force of this Law shall be entered in the special register referred to in Article 8 of the Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, enacted into law with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, n. 36, as amended, may exercise, with immediate effect, the functions of the second paragraph of Article 8 of the Decree, as amended by Article 1 of this law (1).
(1) These practitioners enrolled to practice in the special register kept by the Council of the authority. They, on the date of entry into force of this Act, and were immediately admitted to practice law before the courts.
6. - The provision of Article 3 shall apply from the session bar exam (1) for the year 1986.Il practice period provided for in Article 2 is required from the exam session as a lawyer for the year 1987.
(1) The term "solicitor" means either deleted or replaced with "lawyer" pursuant to art. 3 L. 02/24/1997 No 27.
7. - This Act shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal

Get Well Card Broken Leg

L. March 23, 1940, No 254

Law March 23, 1940, No 254 (in Gazz. No., April 23, 96).
Modifications to the Bar.

Preamble
(Omitted).


Article 1 (Omitted) (1).
(1) Modify or replace the Articles. 14, 16, 17, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 38, 44, 47, 50, 52, 61, 71, 96, 97, 100 and the heading of Title V of the rdl November 27, 1933, No 1578.


Article 2 (Omitted) (1).
(1) Replace the first paragraph of art. 45 rd January 22, 1934, No 37.


Article 3 Use of the Bar Council proposed by the professional against the decision of removal from the first hearing was set after the deadlines laid down in Articles. 60 and 61 of Royal Decree of 22 January 1934 No 37.


Article 4 For the validity of the resolutions of the Bar Council is the intervention of seven members. The presentation of
application, it may not be made by the public prosecutor must be accompanied, on pain of inadmissibility, the receipt of payment of pounds 100 (1) performed in a registry office.
(1) Amount raised to 800 pounds art. 1 d.lg.cps September 13, 1946, No 261.


Article 5 (Omitted) (1).
(1) Replaces the art. 4, l. May 28, 1936, No 1003.


Article 6 (Omitted) (1).
(1) Replaces the art. 4, rd July 9, 1936, No 1482.


Article 7 (Omitted) (1).
(1) Replaces the art. 7, rd July 9, 1936, No 1482.

Article 8
at the Boards for examinations as a lawyer and a prosecutor in Rome and those for inclusion in the special, consisting of secretariats, which are assigned magistrates, who direct them, and clerks appointed by the Ministry of Justice in the required number.


Article 9 Within one month after the entry into force of this Act, the Councils of the Bar Associations, and prosecutors will call lawyers and prosecutors who are members of the district enrollment, assigning a term not exceeding thirty days for reply, to declare in writing to your honor

a) they are not in any of the conditions that prohibit or restrict the practice of law;
b) they are not enrolled in the 'same time as other district attorneys or prosecutors.

If the statements are not received within the prescribed period, the practitioner may be suspended from training until he has fulfilled the request. Article 10


Even regardless of the declaration referred to in the preceding article, the councils will take the orders, as appropriate, measures or cancellation from membership in the special in comparison to those that are in the conditions of referred to in subparagraph a) of the article.
against the decision of the Council of the An appeal to the Bar Council. The appeal has suspensive effect.


Article 11 When issuing a declaration under Article. 9 professional who has registered as a lawyer or as a prosecutor in two different books will tell which one belongs by reason of actual residence and who intends to remain registered.
Within six months after entry into force of this Act, the Directors of syndicates of lawyers and prosecutors will undertake a review of outstanding books, which finds that all members are resident in the jurisdiction of the Court, as set Articles. 17, No 7 and 27 No 3, the RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578; and pronounce the cancellation of those who turn out to have lost residence in the same area, observed the rules of the proceeding.
prosecutors removed from the register under the preceding paragraph, which call for the enrollment on the constituency of their actual residence, not subject to the attenuated by art. 25 DL mentioned, as regards the number of seats to be allocated within the year as a transfer and the period of two years from the previous registration.


Article 12 Within six months after entry into force of this Act, the Directors of syndicates of lawyers and prosecutors will proceed to an extraordinary revision of registers of the lawyers in order to ensure members after 1 February 1934 the possession of the requirement of the qualification period of six years of practice as an attorney, necessary for inclusion in the 'in terms of 'Art. 27, No 2 of RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578.
Its deliberations shall be notified to the public prosecutor under Article. 31, but the deadline for appeal by the prosecutor for the Board of Bar is three months of notification.


Article 13 The Government of the Republic is authorized to collect in a single text the RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578, with the this Law and other laws on the organization of the professions of lawyer and prosecutor, by making the necessary modifications for the purpose of coordination.

Best Currencies To Invest In 2010

Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37

Royal Decree of 22 January 1934, No 37
(in Gazz. No., January 30, 24)

Additional regulations and implementation of the rdl November 27, 1933, No 1578, on the organization of the legal profession [and Attorney] (a) (2) (3) (4).
(1) The term "solicitor" shall be read replaced by the term "lawyer" to effect the provisions of art. 3, l. February 24, 1997, No 27, suppression of the register of solicitors. Every time the prosecutor used the term it was decided to limit it in square brackets.
(2) In place of the Minister / Ministry of Justice read the Minister / Ministry of Justice under Presidential Decree 13 September 1999.
(3) Article 5 bis of the DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180, the reference to the jury contained in this Decree, the Subcommittee examiner.
(4) Article 6 ter of the DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180 the provisions of Articles 1-a, 1-b, 2, 3, 5 - and 6 bis - bis does not apply to the first session examination after the date of entry into force of this decree. Preamble

(Omitted). Article 1 Article

1.La application for entry in the special register of practitioners is addressed to the Council of the Bar [and prosecutors] in whose area the applicant has his residence, and must be accompanied by: a) birth certificate b) of the general certificate of criminal record, to date no earlier than three months to show c) documents proving that the conditions referred to in paragraphs 1), 2) and 4) of article. RDL 17 of 27 November 1933, No 1578; d) a certificate [of attorney] who, having admitted the applicant to attend the just study the effects of the practice, it gives attestazione.La application must be signed by an applicant and contain a list of documents it allegati.Il requirement of paragraph 4) of article. RDL 17 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, must be proved by producing the original diploma of laurea.L 'aspirant who intends to engage in advocacy before the Courts under Article. RDL 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, must ask the question, to be admitted, and state that is not in any of the cases of incompatibility predicted in art. 3 of the Royal Decree-Law and art. Royal decreto.Il 13 of this diploma is returned to the person after the Council voted on the application for admission. Article 2

Art 2.The exempt from presenting a certificate referred to in subparagraph d) of the previous article: a) those in the application for admission to practice before the Courts under Article. RDL 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578; b) those who have registered to attend a seminar or other Institute established at a university of the Republic for the purposes of art. 18, first paragraph, of the same decree-law, and produce the relevant certificate. Article 3

Art 3.Il Council must act on applications for registration in special register within thirty days of submission esse.Qualora of the Council has not acted within the prescribed period in the previous paragraph, the interested party, within ten days after the deadline, you may appeal to the Bar Council for lawyers [and prosecutors], which decides on the merits enrollment. In the case of art. 1, the fourth paragraph of this decree, if the application is rejected for reasons relating solely to the admission to practice before the Courts, the applicant may be entered in the register of practitioners for the purpose of the practice of others in a manner determined by the RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578. To that end he must produce the necessary documentazione.Si apply to the decisions on applications for registration of practitioners of the provisions of paragraphs second, third and fifth Article. RDL 31 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, and art. 45 of this Decree. Article 4

Art 4.Il period of practice is computed from the date of the resolution by which the Council has ordered the registration speciale.Per practitioners engaged in the cases before the Courts under Article. RDL 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, the period of practice the day on which they have lent giuramento.Nel a failure of practice for a period exceeding six months, the practitioner is erased from the register of practitioners, being ineffective in the period practice already done.

Article 5 Article 5. (Omitted) (1). (1) See, now, Article 10 of Decree 10 April 1990, No 101.

Article 6 Article 6. (Omitted) (1). (1) See, now, Article 10 of Decree 10 April 1990, No 101.

Article 7 Article 7. (Omitted) (1). (1) See, now, Article 10 of Decree 10 April 1990, No 101. Article 8

Art 8.Il practitioner who, after having already completed a period of practice, will be admitted to practice before the Courts under Article. RDL 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, to put questions to the Bar Council. Shall apply to applications under the preceding paragraph the provisions of Article. 1, fourth paragraph, and art. 3, first paragraph, second and fourth of this decreto.Ai for recognition of the practice period already completed, the practitioner must demonstrate to the effective conduct of the practice itself, in the manner prescribed by this decree.

Article 9 Article 9. (Omitted). (1) (a) See Article 10 of Decree 10 April 1990, No 101. Article 10

10.Il Art Council of the issue, at their request, a certificate of completion to those who practice the documents they produce in terms of previous articles turn out to have expected the same practice, for the period prescribed with diligence and profitto.Il Council must act on the request of within fifteen days after submission of essa.Avverso the deliberation with which the application is not accepted, the person concerned has the right to complain to the National Council forense.La it to the person entitled to claim even if the Council has not acted within prescritto.In following a complaint from the preceding paragraphs, the National Council, called the documents, decide on the merits of the petition. Article 11 Article 11.I

practitioners [prosecutors] who do the cases before the Courts under Article. RDL 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, must have their residence in the district of the Council at which they are registered. Article 12

Article 12.In case of transfer of residence, the practitioner can apply to be entered in the register of practitioners of the district in which it is trasferito.La question is addressed to the Council of the district itself, and must be accompanied by documents specified in a), b), c) of the first paragraph of Article. 1 and of the certificate under Article. 41 and the other documents relating to the conduct of pratica.Nel If the application is accepted, the practitioner is registered with the retirement of the previous iscrizione.Si apply for transfer requests, the provisions of Article. 3. Article 13

Art 13.Ai practitioners [prosecutors] that exercise cases before the Courts under Article. RDL 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, the provisions on incompatibility of Art. 3 of the Royal Decree-Law. Article 14

Art 14.La-registration of practitioners is pronounced by the council, office or at the request of the Prosecutor: a) in cases of incompatibility in terms of the previous article: b) in cases referred to in paragraph 2) art. RDL 37, November 27, 1933, No 1578; c) in cases referred to the third paragraph of art. 4 of this Decree; d) the practitioner admitted to practice before the Courts has not been sworn, without justifiable reason, within thirty days of notification of the admission decision, without prejudice to Article. 8, third paragraph, of Royal Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578; e) was not observed when the residence requirement foreseen in art. 11del this decree; f) when writing up his / her registration. The provisions of Article. 37 subsections second, third, fourth, fifth and eighth of the RDL 27 November 1933, No 1578, and art. 45 of this decreto.I practitioners removed from the Special Register are entitled to be reused if they demonstrate, it is the case, the termination of the events that led to the cancellation, and the actual existence of the licenses under which they were originally registered, and are meeting the requirements listed in numbers 1), 2) and 3) art. RDL 17 of 27 November 1933, No 1578.Fermo the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the practitioner has been canceled for reasons related solely to the exercise of advocacy before the Courts can be reinstated in the register for the purpose of exclusion from legal practice with the stesso.Per Reregistrations are applicable provisions of Article. 3, first paragraph, second and fourth of this decree. Article 15

Art 15.Il Minister of Justice shall, by its decree, the days when the written tests will be carried out tests to the profession of [attorney], and the date by which applications must be submitted for admission exams medesimi.Il decree is published in the Official Bulletin of the Ministry and in the Official Gazette at least ninety days before the date fixed for the beginning Evidence scritte.Omissis (1). The subcommittees examined were based at the courts of appeal. (2) By a decree, the Minister of Justice shall determine, by lot, the combinations of candidates identified under 'Article 9, paragraph 3 of the Rules of the decree of the President of the Republic April 10, 1990, No 101, as amended, and the headquarters of the Court of Appeal where the correction takes place written papers. (3) The draw of the preceding paragraph shall be made after grouping the locations of the Court of Appeal that have a number of applications it sufficiently homogeneous to ensure the adequacy between the composition of sub-committees for examination and the number of candidates in each seat (3). The interview took place in the same place of the written test. (3) perform the duties of a Secretary-Registrar of the Court of Appeal appointed by the Chief President (4). In the event scheduled Art. 22 of Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578, as the secretariat shall be performed by one or more judges appointed by the Minister of Justice from among judges assigned to the Ministry (5). (A) Paragraph deleted by Article 2 of Decree 21 May 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180. (2) amended by Section 2 of the DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180.Comma added by Article 2 of Decree 21 May 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180. (4) See Article 8 of Law March 23, 1940, No 240. (5) See, now, the new text of art. 22 rdl November 27, 1933, No 1578, as replaced by art. 1, l. June 27, 1988, No 242. Article 16

Art 16.Nel deadline, candidates must submit to the subcommittee set up under 'Article 22, paragraph 4 of Royal Decree-Law of 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, 36, and subsequently amended the application for admission to the examinations accompanied by: a) the original diploma of graduation, 2) the certificate under Article. 10 of this Decree, and 3) the receipt of the prescribed fee for admission exams, 4) documents required to authenticate the certificates of training earlier in the list under Article. 23, fourth paragraph, points 1), 2), 3) and 4) of Royal Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578; 5) a certificate on the score obtained in the examination of laurea.I candidates who are entitled to enrollment on the [prosecutors] an unlimited number must produce the relevant documentation. For they are not prescribed by the documents specified in the numbers 4) and 5) of the preceding paragraph (a) (2). Those who do not have the right to register an unlimited number, they must, in the application, make the declaration set out in Article . 23, first paragraph, of the Royal Decree of 27 November 1933 No 1578, and in art. 29 of this Decree, or intends to present a separate document within the prescribed period. (2) Notwithstanding the fourth paragraph of Article 19 of Royal Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law January 22, 1934, 36, applicants can submit a certificate referred to in paragraph 2 of the first paragraph of this article after the deadline for the submission of the application, but no later than twenty days prior to the date fixed for the beginning of the written tests. (3) Those who are under the foreseeable conditions in art. 18, second paragraph, of the Royal Decree of 27 November 1933 No 1578, must submit, in place of the document referred to in paragraph 2) the first paragraph of this Article, a certificate of the Administration in which they served, the requirement to prove that the Vice-Pretoria prescritto.Per fees, the certificate will be given the judgments entered, the instructor and other business transacted. Assuming that Article. 22 of Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578, for which the candidate must declare District Court of Appeal, he participates in the examination. (2) (a) amended by Section 1b of the DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180. (2) See the suspension of the limitation of the posts by virtue of 'art. 1 of D.LG.LGT. September 7, 1944, No 215. (3) Paragraph replaced by art. 3, l. April 20, 1989, No 142. Article 17

Art 17.La jury act without delay on admission applications under the previous article and will compile a list of candidates to esami.L 'list shall be filed at least fifteen days before any testing in the offices of the secretariat of each commissione.A candidate admitted to the examinations is given notice of acceptance, and of the day, time and place where he will present written evidence to support (1). (1) See Article Article 5a of the DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180.
Article 17 Article 17-Bis
bis.1. The written tests are three. They are carried out on the issues raised by the Minister of Justice and relate to: a) preparing a reasoned opinion, to choose between two matters regulated by the Civil Code, b) draw up a reasoned opinion, to choose between two questions in matters covered by the penal code, c) the establishment of a judicial act which calls for knowledge of substantive law and procedural law, on a question proposed by the candidate of choice in matters of private law, criminal law and the right amministrativo.2. For each component of each written examination boards has 10 merit points, the oral test are open to candidates who have achieved in the three written tests, an overall score of at least 90 points and a minimum score of 30 points for at least two prove.3. The oral examinations are to: a) in the discussion, after a brief explanation of the written tests, short questions relating to five subjects, including at least one of procedural law, chosen in advance by the candidate from among the following: constitutional law, civil law, commercial employment law, criminal law, administrative law, tax law, civil procedure, criminal procedural law, private international law, ecclesiastical law and Community law (1) (2), b) in the demonstration of knowledge of forensic and human rights and duties of the lawyer .4. For the oral exam every member of the commission has 10 merit points for each of the subjects under review (3) .5. Are considered suitable candidates who receive an overall score for the oral exams at least 180 points and a minimum score of 30 points for at least five tests. (4) (1) Letter as amended by art. 4, l. April 20, 1989, No 142. (2) Amended by paragraph 5 of the DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180. (3) See Article Article 5a of the DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180. (4) Article added by art. 3, l. June 27, 1988, No 242.

Article 18 Article 18. (Omitted) (1). (Omitted) (1). The theme for each test submitted by the Ministry of Justice in a sealed envelope is delivered by the First President of the Court of Appeal , the President of the jury on the day fixed for the test stessa.Il Chairman of the Committee shall read out after you see the candidates on the integrity of the seals (2). Assuming in art. 22 of Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578, shall apply as regards the order of the tests and the choice of subjects, the provisions of Article. 33, first and second paragraphs of this Decree. (3) (1) repealed by Comma. 9, l. June 27, 1988, No 242. (2) See Article Article 5a of the DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180. (3) See, now, the new text of art. 22 rdl November 27, 1933, No 1578, as replaced by art. 1, l. June 27, 1988, No 242. Article 19 Article 19.I

candidates must prove their identity before each exam, presenting an identification document that has been issued by a State, or a photo of their recent date stamped by a notary public or authenticated by legalized by the prefectural and municipal (1). (1) See, now, art. 18, l. January 4, 1968, No 15. Article 20

Art 20.Per the performance of each written test shall be allocated seven hours from the time of dictation on the topic. Examinations are not allowed to candidates who present themselves when the dictation was iniziata.I Applicants must use only paper bearing the seal of the commission and the signature of the chairman or a commissioner appointed by him. They can not confer with each other or communicate in any way with strangers. It is excluded from consideration person who violates this prohibition and in general the provisions have been made to ensure the regularity of the examination. During the time that the test must be held in the local examinations at least two members of the committee. Are entrusted with the police exam. Article 21 Article 21.I

candidates can not bring into the place where the examination books, pamphlets, writings and notes of any kind. They can only see the codes, but only commented on the case law, the laws and decrees of the State, and for this purpose have right to send their texts to the jury at least three days before the written tests. The papers presented are verified by the committee (a) (2). They must be excluded from the examination who were in possession of books, pamphlets, writings, notes of any kind prohibited under this article.The 'exclusion is ordered by the commissioners present examination. In case of disagreement between them the decision is left to the president. (1) paragraph as amended by art. 4, l. June 27, 1988, No 242. (2) See Article Article 5a of the DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180.

Article 22 Article 22.1. The candidate will be delivered in each of three days to examine two envelopes of the same color, a big equipped with a coupon serial number, corresponding the serial number of the candidate list of candidates admitted under consideration, and a small card containing a bianco.2. The candidate, having developed the theme, with no subscription or other object to mark, place the sheet or sheets in large envelope, which also makes the small envelope, sealed, containing the white paper where he stated his name, surname, date of birth and residence, and return everything to the president or his / her place. The latter, after verifying that the number of large envelope marked on the coupon matches the serial number of the applicant shall affix his signature across the envelope in the same way that ruins including its flap, and, stuck on margins, the impression in wax of the seal of commissione.3. All envelopes containing the work is entrusted, at the end of each test, the Secretary, after collecting them in one or more parcels signed out by one of the members of the committee, and sealed in wax with the imprint of the seal of the Board .4. In the days immediately following the last test and the time indicated by the Chairman, the Committee in plenary session, in the presence of at least five persons nominated by the President and promptly informed, finds that the seals and signatures, it opens the packages containing envelopes with the work, the three groups on the respective envelopes with coupons the same number and, after removing the coupons, the largest closed in a single envelope, which is affixed a serial number is completed only when the operation of grouping all the envelopes with the work, taking care to stir the envelopes themselves first to oppose the above number progressivo.5. All numbered envelopes duly sealed are then gathered into folds in the same manner indicated in paragraph 2.6. Of all the transactions referred to in the preceding paragraphs, as well as everything that happens during the course of the tests, Minutes shall be signed by the Chairman or his representative and the segretario.7. The review of the work contained in three bags grouped under paragraph 4 is performed simultaneously (1) (1). Article replaced by art. 5, l. June 27, 1988, No 242. Article 23

Art 23.Esaurite the transactions referred to 'Article 22, the chairman of the subcommittee referred to' Article 22, paragraph 4, of Royal Decree Law of 27 November 1933 No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended, shall notify the President of the Court of Appeal which, even through the person in charge, ordered the transfer of the envelopes containing the papers prepared by candidates for the Court of Appeal found under 'Article 15, paragraphs fourth and fifth, with which must be correction, by delivery of the prison inspector specifically delegated by the Head of Department of Prison (1). The President of the Court of Appeal found under 'Article 15, fourth and fifth paragraphs, from which must be the correction, he receives, even through the person in charge, the envelopes containing the papers and ordering the delivery to the chairmen of subcommittees, which attested the proper receipt of the envelopes, have the beginning of the operations audit of the projects contained therein. (1) Upon completion of the transactions processed correction of the President of the Court of Appeal found under ' Article 15, fourth and fifth paragraphs, receives the chairmen of the subcommittees referred to 'Article 22, paragraph 4, of Royal Decree Law of 27 November 1933 No 1578, ratified with amendments by Law 22 January 1934, No 36, as amended, the envelopes containing the papers, the minutes show the correction operations and the opinions expressed, and arrange for the transfer to the Court of Appeal for membership of the candidates, which takes place at the oral examination. The transfer is made in the manner specified in the preceding paragraphs (1). The commission, in the case of division into sub-committees, carries out a review of written work in the shortest time and in any event no later than six months after the conclusion of trials: an extension of that deadline may be placed only once, and in any event not later than ninety days, by order of the President of the Court of Appeal, the circumstances are exceptional and duly recorded. (2) The committee assigns score to each of the three papers grouped according to Article 22, paragraph 4, after reading all three, with the rules laid down in Article 17-bis (1). The committee, if it determines that the work is either entirely or partly copied from another work or any publication, cancel the test. It must also be reversed, however, the examination of candidates who have been made to recognize. (1) Clause 3 of Article circumstances DL May 21, 2003, No 112, enacted into law July 18, 2003, No 180. (2) Paragraph replaced by art. 6, l. June 27, 1988, No 242. Article 24

Art 24.Il vote must be recorded immediately by the Secretary, in all letters in the bottom of the job. The note is signed by the President and segretario.Terminata review of all written work, the Committee shall open the envelopes containing the names of candidates.

Article 25 Article 25. (Omitted) (1). (Omitted) (1). The list of permitted signed by the President and the Secretary, shall be deposited in the offices of the secretariat of the committee. The chairman then determines the date, time and place where the trials will begin orali.L 'interval between the filing of the list of allowed and the start of oral evidence can not be less than one month nor more than two (2). A each of those admitted is notified of the day, time and place where he will take the oral test. (1) repealed by Comma. 9, l. June 27, 1988, No 242. (2) Subsection as amended by art. 7, l. June 27, 1988, No 242. Article 26

Art 26.La oral examination is public and should last no less than 45 and not more than 60 minutes for each candidate (1). After the test each candidate's vote shall be in accordance with the rules set Art. 17-bis and the secretary shall record the results in minutes, separately for each subject (2). Applicants must take the oral test in the order that is set by the President. After the first appeal proceed immediately to the second. Candidates who are not presented to any first or second appeal shall lose the right exam. (1) See, Art. 2, d.lg.lgt. September 7, 1944, No 215. (2) Subsection as amended by art. 8, l. June 27, 1988, No 242.

Article 27 Article 27. (Omitted) (1). (Omitted) (1). For the purposes of establishing the list under Article. RDL 23 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, has compiled a list of all candidates declared fit, which is not entitled to register an unlimited number, with the indication for each of the scores obtained in the written tests and orali.L 'list shall be signed by the President and the Secretary. (1) repealed by Comma. 9, l. June 27, 1988, No 242.

Article 28 Article 28. (Omitted) (1). (1) The provisions of this Article shall be considered out of date, following the entry into force of d.lg.lgt. September 7, 1944, No 215.

Article 29 Article 29. (Omitted) (1). (1) The provisions of this Article shall be considered out of date, following the entry into force of d.lg.lgt. September 7, 1944, No 215.
Article 30
Art 30.Di all operations relating to the conduct of the exams is up a report by the Secretary. The minutes were signed by the President and by the same secretary.

Article 31 Article 31. (Omitted) (1). (1) Article deleted from. 6, l. February 24, 1997, No 27.

Article 32 Article 32. (Omitted) (1). (1) Article deleted from. 6, l. February 24, 1997, No 27.

Article 33 Article 33. (Omitted) (1). (1) Article deleted from. 6, l. February 24, 1997, No 27.

Article 34 Article 34. (Omitted) (1). (1) Article deleted from. 6, l. February 24, 1997, No 27. Article 35

Art 35.Le questions for inclusion in the registers, as well as being accompanied by documents evidencing the requirements established by law, must be signed by the applicants and include a list of all documents allegati.Nelle applications for registration in a register of lawyers [or a register of attorneys] shall declare the candidates, their honor, which are not found in any of the cases of incompatibility laid down by Royal Decree of 27 November 1933 No 1578. Those requests must also be attached to the receipt of fee paid for the works of university educational assistance under Article. 190 of the single text approved by Royal Decree 31 August 1933, No 1592.

Article 36 Article 36. (Omitted) (1). (1) The provisions of this Article shall be considered out of date, following the entry into force of d.lg.lgt. September 7, 1944, No 215.

Article 37 Article 37. (Omitted) (1). (1) The provisions referred to in this article are now obsolete following the entry into force of Law February 24, 1997, No 27, suppression of the register of solicitors. Article 38

Art 38.Coloro who aspire to membership [in the register of attorneys or] in a register of lawyers to terms, respectively, of the Articles. 26, first paragraph b) and c) (1), and 30 of Royal Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578, must prove that they belong to one of the categories mentioned in these articles, by Administration certificate authority. (1) now also under subparagraphs d) and e), added to the above paragraph from 'art. 1 No 8, l. March 23, 1940, No 254. Article 39

Art 39.Gli lawyers who aspire to enrollment in special art. RDL 33, November 27, 1933, No 1578, must unite to demand a certificate from the President of the Bar, which shows the current enrollment on the seniority of the lawyers it with the declaration that the candidate has actually been practicing for the period prescribed (1). Omission (2). In the cases referred to the third paragraph of Article. 33 and the second paragraph art. RDL 34, November 27, 1933, No 1578, the candidates must produce a certificate from the competent government which shows that they belong to a category of objects under the same third paragraph of Article. And in the first paragraph of Article 33. 34. (1) Subsection replaced by Art. 5 d.lg.cps May 28, 1947, No 597. (1) Paragraph deleted by art. 5 d.lg.cps May 28, 1947, No 597. Article 40

Art 40.Coloro aspiring special enrollment under Article. 34, first paragraph, of the Royal Decree of 27 November 1933 No 1578, must include the following: a) a certificate from the competent administration, which shows that they belong to a the groups mentioned in that article, b) a certificate from the competent President of the Council of the Bar, which shows their current enrollment in an accredited lawyers. Article 41

Art 41.Per transfers scheduled in the Articles. 25 and 32 of Royal Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578, the application must be accompanied by a certificate from the Chairman of the order of the district in which the person belongs to, which shows that there is no impediment to the transfer. Article 42

Art 42.Le meetings of the Bar Council and those of local councils to deal with business referrals to them in terms of the RDL 27 November 1933, No 1578, are not pubbliche.Per each meeting is drawn up the minutes, which is signed by the President and the resolutions segretario.I devices must be reported in full in order verbale.Presso local councils, the President shall be replaced in cases of absence or impediment, by the eldest member. In the sessions of the Councils as the secretariat shall be exercised by the members appointed under Article. 75 of this Decree. Article 43

Art 43.Per the validity of the resolutions of the Bar Council action is required at least nine members in case of an equality of votes the vote of the President (1). For the validity of the proceedings in matters of jurisdiction of the Bar Council premises in terms of the RDL 27 November 1933, No 1578, requires the intervention of no less than half the total number of components (2). Decisions are taken by majority of votes in the event of a tie vote of the President. (1) See, now, art. 22, d.lg.lgt. November 23, 1944, No 382. (2) See, now, art. 16, d.lg.lgt. November 23, 1944, No 382. Article 44

Art 44.Le deliberations of the National Council and local councils of those are signed by the President and Secretary and are published by the deposit of the original offices of the secretariat. Article 45

Art 45.Nei cases provided for in Articles. 24, fourth paragraph, 31, third paragraph, 37, second paragraph, 42, third paragraph, 43, second paragraph, of the Royal Decree of 27 November 1933 No 1578, the person must be given a period of not less than ten days to submit their comments about the facts (1). The term may be extended, upon request, by order of the President of the Bar Council. L 'question, if it so request, shall be allowed to personally present his explanations and to present witnesses. He may be assisted by counsel. (1) Paragraph replaced by art. 2, l. March 23, 1940, No 254. Article 46

Art 46.Alle communications to be done in terms of the RDL 27 November 1933, No 1578, and this decree, a decision by the office of secretary by registered letter with acknowledgment of ritorno.Le notifications are performed by these offices through a bailiff. Article 47

Art 47.Il President of the Bar should be notified immediately to the person and the prosecutor of disciplinary proceedings have been initiated under Article. RDL 38, November 27, 1933, No 1578. The notification must contain the summary statement of the facts for which the procedure was the same iniziato.Lo President, or a member of the Board appointed by him, then collect the relevant information and documents it considers necessary for the procedure and deductions that are received by the public prosecutor dall'incolpato and sets out which witnesses are relevant to the investigation of the facts and provide any other indagine.Il then the President shall appoint rapporteur from among members of the Board, and set the date for the session proceedings and ordered the summons dell'incolpato, with the observance of the prescribed period in art. RDL 45, November 27, 1933, No 1578. Article 48

Art 48.La all'incolpato citation shall be served and the public prosecutor. This must include: 1) the general dell'incolpato 2) the detailed statement of objections, and 3) state the place, day and time of appearance, with a warning that the accused may be assisted by counsel, and that in case of failure to appear, the trial will be conducted in his absence, 4) the list of witnesses to be presented in court, 5) the period within which the accused, his counsel and the prosecutor will examine the documents of the proceedings suggest deductions and state witnesses; 6) the date and signature of Presidente.Ordinata the service of the summons, the President shall also the summoning of witnesses. Article 49

Art 49.L 'and accused the prosecutor, should lead witnesses in terms of n. 5 of the previous Article, shall expose briefly the circumstances on which they intend that witnesses are esaminati.Il Chairman of the Board order, order the summoning of witnesses indicati.Qualora is not possible to provide promptly to the summons of the witnesses indicated, the President orders the postponement of the trial to another sitting next , giving immediate notice all'incolpato, the public prosecutor and the witnesses already mentioned. Article 50

Art 50.Nella session established, the speaker presents the facts and findings of the procedure. It is then interrogated the accused, the witnesses are examined and the defender is allowed to exhibit his deduzioni.L 'the accused shall have the last word, if the accused does not domanda.Qualora present or justify such failure, proceed in his absence. Article 51

Art 51.Chiusa the discussion, the Council acts outside the presence of difensore.Si dell'incolpato and observe, as applicable, the provisions of Article. 473 of the Code of penale.La decision is made by the rapporteur and shall include a statement of facts, the grounds on which it is based, the device, indicating the day, month and year in which it is pronounced and subscription the President and the Secretary. It is published by the deposit of the original offices of the secretariat. Article 52

Art 52.Nei proceedings taking place before the Council of the lawyers [and prosecutors], in the case provided for in art. 38, third paragraph, of Royal Decree Law of 27 November 1933 No 1578 (a) shall apply to the foregoing provisions of this Chapter. (2) The same shall apply in proceedings before the Bar Council, in the case provided for in art. 54, No 2, the same RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578, observed the rules for decision-making art. 64 of this Decree. (1) Now the fourth paragraph, after replacing the original second paragraph of art. 38 rdl November 27, 1933, No 1578 with two paragraphs, under Article. 1 No 15, l. March 23, 1940, No 254. (2) See, now, the provisions of d.lg.cps May 28, 1947, No 597. Article 53

Art 53.La disqualification of members of the Council be given until the day before the date set for trial. The document in question is presented in the offices of the Council Secretariat and must contain, under penalty of inadmissibility, the grounds on which the objection is based, and be signed by the person or his attorney speciale.La have no objection abstaining acts anteriormente.Le effect on appeals against decisions relating to recusal or abstention, shall not stay the course of disciplinary proceedings. Article 54

Art 54.La informed of the reasons for objecting to the Board member, when, for effect of this, except the members objected, the other to reach the required number of decidere.Prima the Council will decide the notice of objection to the other parties concerned, invite the members objected to without delay to provide their comments on the grounds of the challenge, and conduct inquiries it deems occorrenti.Le other interested parties may submit their deductions within five days of notification. Article 55

Art 55.Nel case provided for in art. 49, second paragraph, of the Royal Decree of 27 November 1933 No 1578, the application is made in the manner and terms set out in the first paragraph of art. Decreto.Il 53 of this action is communicated to other interested parties, by the Council, and members objected to without delay are invited to provide their comments on the challenge. Other interested parties may submit their deductions within five days of comunicazione.Il action, together with the pleadings and the inferences of the preceding paragraph, it is then sent to the National Council forense.Il National Council or the Council 's Order background investigation they judge necessary, decide as soon as possible, and if the objection to admit, continue the procedure up to the definition of esso.Si apply to the proceedings, the rules of Articles. 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 and 52 of this decreto.Qualora it be dismissed or the rejections are admitted in part so that it is lacking in the relevant Council the number of members required to decide, the documents are immediately sent back to the Board for the further course of procedimento.Nel case of abstentions, as a result of which is lacking in Council the number of components required to decide, the proceeding shall be forwarded to the National Council. Of abstentions and the transmission of documents shall be made immediately communicated to the parties concerned, which have right to send, within ten days of the Appeal, the Council nazionale.Il National Council or the Bar Council, if they recognize the pleas of abstentions, continue in the disciplinary proceedings until the definition of it, with the observance of the articles listed in the previous paragraph quinto.Qualora the National Council or the Bar Council to recognize the unfounded reasons for abstentions or admit in part so that it will not missing in the relevant Council the number of components required to decide, remit the case to the Board, for the further course of procedimento.Può be entitled to abstain for reasons of convenience, not covered by law as grounds for recusal. Article 56

Art 56.Nel case provided for in art. 49, third paragraph, of Royal Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578, each of the Councils among them has led to a conflict of jurisdiction, it shall forward the pleadings to the National Council forense.Della transmission of documents shall immediately be communicated to the parties concerned, which may forward their deductions to the Bar Council within ten days comunicazione.In by following the decision of the Bar Council, the documents are submitted to the Council that the order has been accepted competente.L 's appeal against the decision of the Bar Council does not suspend the course of disciplinary proceedings. Article 57

Art 57.Sono subject to disciplinary proceedings practitioners who are guilty of incorrect facts in the dignity and the dignity of the legal profession, or exercise their legal terms of Article. RDL 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, of abuse or misconduct in the exercise of patronage itself.

Art 58.Si apply Article 58 in respect of the discipline of practitioners, the provisions of Title IV of the Royal Decree of 27 November 1933 No 1578, and those of Chapters I and II of this titolo.La suspension due to the discontinuation of the practice. During the suspension period the offender is deprived of the effect of radiation patrocinio.Per the offender can not be entered in the register of practitioners, without prejudice to art. RDL 47, November 27, 1933, No 1578, and the first paragraph of this article. Article 59

Art 59.Il use of the Bar Council is presented in the offices of the council that issued the ruling, and shall include the specification of the grounds on which it is based, and be accompanied by a copy of the ruling itself, notified ricorrente.Agli effects to the commencement of the period for appeal expected in art. 50, third paragraph, RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578, it has regard to the date on which the notification was issued the contested decision to the professional concerned and, in the case of most professionals, the date of the notificazione.L 'office of the Council will immediately, in copy to the other parties Appeal has been presented under the first paragraph of this article. The public prosecutor is notified of the date of notification of the contested measure interessati.Il appeal to professionals and other pleadings are filed in the offices of the Council for the period of ten days from the expiration of the one established for use. In the case of Article. 50, third paragraph, RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578, the term of the deposit following the expiry of the one established for the use incidentale.Fino when the acts are secured interested parties may view it, propose deductions and produce documenti.Il appeal and other documents and the submissions and documents; in the previous paragraph are then forwarded to the Bar Council. Article 60

Art 60.La secretary of the Bar Council, upon receipt of the documents referred to in the preceding article, shall inform the Public Prosecutor at the Court of Cassation of the Republic, which shall arrange for the refund within fifteen days of receipt . At the same time the same voice warns the applicant and other interested parties that the documents remain deposited in the offices of the National Council for the period of ten days from the day following that on which the prosecution must carry out the purposes of communication restituzione.Ai predicted in the previous paragraph, like any other, and notifications required, the parties concerned must promptly give an address in Rome at a person or office and give notice to the secretary of the National Council. If no address for service, communications and notifications are made by deposit in the Council Secretariat nazionale.Nel proceedings before the National Council of the professional in question may be assisted by a lawyer in the special register referred to in Article. RDL 33, November 27, 1933, No 1578, equipped with a special mandate. Article 61

Art 61.Durante the period referred to in the second paragraph of the preceding Article, the applicant, his counsel and other parties may inspect the records, to propose deductions and produce documenti.Uguale right rests with the prosecutor at the Court of cassazione.Il President of the Bar Council then appoints a rapporteur from among the members of the Board and fix the date of the session for discussion of ricorso.La discuss the appeal can not take place earlier than ten days after the deadline set out in that second paragraph of Article precedente.Del measure with which the session was fixed immediately be notified to the applicant and other interested parties with details of the day and time when the session will take place. Article 62

Art 62.La discussion of the action takes place with the intervention of the Public Prosecutor at the Supreme Court when the action was brought by the prosecutor or, if proposed by the professional, involves a measure of removal from the state or Let there be cross-appeal of the Public Ministero.L 'intervention of the prosecutor is also required in the case of appeal against the Resolution provides in Articles . RDL 35 and 47, November 27, 1933, No 1578.In any case, the prosecution has the right to intervene, without prejudice to art. 65 of this Decree. Article 63

Art 63.Nel day appointed the adviser in charge shall report on the action. So the professional in question is allowed to exhibit his deductions personally or through his legal counsel and the prosecutor, when it is spoken, carries out its conclusioni.La determination of the appeal is decided outside the presence dell'incolpato and defender. The prosecutor assists with the decision. (1) are observed, as applicable, the provisions of Article. 473 of the Code of penale.È in the National Council of faculty, at the request of the parties or office, any further investigation deemed necessary to establish the facts. (1) The Constitutional Court ruling by February 17, 1972 No 27, has declared the unconstitutionality of this subparagraph, in so far provides that the prosecutor assists with the decision. Article 64

Art 64.Le Council decisions National Bar are spoken in the name of the Italian people, are prepared by the rapporteur and shall specify the subjects of the application, the applicant's allegations, the conclusions of the prosecutor, when it is tripped, the grounds on which they are based, the device , indicate the date, month and year in which they are uttered, the signature of the President and Secretary (1). They shall be published in the original filing by the Council Secretariat. And a copy will be forwarded immediately to the Attorney General at the Court of Cassation, which shall be notified of the dates which have been carried out in the notification of the decision to other interested parties (1). Paragraph as amended by art. 6 d.lg.cps June 19, 1946, No 1. Article 65

Art 65.Nei proceedings in front of the Bar Council in the cases under Articles. 49, second paragraph, 54, No 2 of RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578, and 52, second paragraph, and 55 of this Decree is speaking at the meeting, the Public Prosecutor at the Court of Cassation. Article 66

Art 66.Il use of the Joint Sections of the Supreme Court should be notified, by bailiff, by the applicant to other interested parties within the time allowed for use by art. RDL 56, November 27, 1933, No 1578.Nei fifteen days after notification to the application must be presented together at the Court at the time of notification and the original copy of the contested decision was notified to ricorrente.Il application is signed by the applicant or his attorney provided with a special mandate, and must contain a statement of facts and the grounds on which it relies, as well as the address for service in Rome, indicating the person or department at which the election is fatta.Le other interested parties can submit their observations within a period of twenty days the notifications referred to in the first paragraph of this article. Article 67

67.La Art Registry of the Supreme Court shall, without delay copies of the application the Attorney General at the Court itself, and requires the proceeding to the secretariat of the National Council, which will ensure its immediate trasmissione.Pervenuti acts and after the deadlines set in the previous article, the first President of the Supreme Court fixed the 'hearing at which the action must be discussed, appoint a rapporteur and acts are disclosed Ministero.Il provision indicating the hearing to discuss the appeal is communicated to the parties at least fifteen days before. The person at the hearing established, shall be entitled to opportunity to defend himself personally or through an attorney in writing in the special art. RDL 33 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, equipped with a mandate speciale.La Court decides after hearing the Opinion of the Public Ministero.Si observe, for the remainder of the provisions, as applicable, of the proceedings before the Court of Final Appeal in civil matters. Article 68

Art 68.Oltre cases identified in the second and third paragraphs of Article. RDL 56, November 27, 1933, No 1578, the Public Prosecutor at the Supreme Court has the right to use the combined sections of the Supreme Court of incompetence, abuse of power and violation of the law against any decision of the Bar Council, which has not been challenged by other interested parties, or both been challenged on grounds other than the Attorney General dedurre.Il will appeal expected in the previous paragraph must be lodged and notified to the parties concerned within thirty days from the expiration of the period in art. 56, third paragraph, of Royal Decree 27 November 1933, No 1578. This period is counted from the date of the last notification to interested parties of the decision of the Council remaining nazionale.Nel observed, as applicable, the provisions of Articles. 66 and 67 of this Decree. Article 69

69.Gli Art books for lawyers [and those of the prosecutors] must contain the list of members in alphabetical order, with an indication of their surname, name [and paternity] (1), as well as academic and honors and decorations, each of the registered office, date of registration and that of the oath and the court before which the oath was prestato.Nell 'special list referred to in the fourth paragraph of Article. RDL 3 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, should be disclosed to any professional body to which the legal department the same professional appartiene.Sono listed in a special register [prosecutors] have been appointed substitutes for other [attorneys] in terms of Article. 9 of Royal Decree-Law. The log must be recorded for each of the registered professional who has nominato.L 'anticipated special album art. RDL 33, November 27, 1933, No 1578, must contain the full name [and paternity] (1) of the members, the date of registration and an indication of the register of lawyers to whom the member appartiene.L 'special register is published at the beginning of each year in Official Gazette of the Ministry of Justice. In the same Bulletin is published subsequent changes. (1) A claim of paternity should be omitted, pursuant to that established by l. October 31, 1955, No 1064. Article 70

Art 70.Il special register of practitioners must include, besides indicating the name, [paternity] (1), date and place of birth and place of residence of the member, the indication date of graduation from the University and who was conferita.Nel register shall be recorded the date of the oath to those who have served under Article. RDL 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578.Il register before use, each is numbered and signed by the Chairman of the order sheet. Entries are made in the register in chronological order according to the date of the Resolution provides in art. 3 of this decreto.I practitioners admitted to practice before the Courts, who have taken the oath under Article. RDL 8 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, must be recorded in a separate list, attached to the special register, and numbered signed under the third paragraph of this article. (1) A claim of paternity should be omitted, because what is established by l. October 31, 1955, No 1064.

Article 71 Article 71. (Omitted). (1) (a) See, now, Article 10 of Decree 10 April 1990, No 101. Article 72

Art 72.Per be admitted to the oath referred to in Articles. 8:12 RDL of November 27, 1933, No 1578, interested parties must present to the court before whom the oath is to be provided a certificate from the President of the Bar, which shows their enrollment on or in the register of practitioners. The court gives notice without delay the oath to the President of the Council officer responsible. Article 73

Art 73.Nei cases referred. RDL 66, November 27, 1933, No 1578, the Bar Council, before ordering, as stated in the second paragraph of that article, the filing of deeds and documents, may take any measure it deems opportuno.Qualora the urgent need for the continuation of the proceedings or other circumstances make this necessary The Council may permit such documents and records to be withdrawn against the release of a detailed receipt of the new [prosecutor or] lawyer, who takes personal commitment to return them to the Council as soon as it is required. [The prosecutor o] the lawyer which has demanded the return of records and documents may be authorized by the Council to be issued by the offices of the Council, at the expense of the customer, a precise description of the acts and documents themselves, with record spending on each of them and a full copy of these documents at the discretion of the President of the Council need to assess professional work provided.

Article 74 Article 74. (Omitted) (1). (1) The provisions of this Article shall be considered out of date due as provided in Art. 8, Presidential Decree 10 April 1990, No 101. Article 75

75.Presso the Art Council of the local offices of the secretariat with regard to the functions referred to the councils themselves with RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578, and with this decree, are directed by a member of the Board appointed by the President. Article 76

Art 76.Gli secretariats of Articles 74 and 75 take care of communications and service of documents and perform all other duties pertaining to them in accordance with RDL November 27, 1933, No 1578, and this decree, according to the instructions that will be given respectively by the President of the National Council and the President of the local council. Article 77

Art 77.Negli secretarial offices of the Bar Council and those of the local councils, are set up: a) a register in which shall be presented in order of date, all minutes of meetings. Each report must be signed by the President and Secretary; b) a general register in which must be recorded in order of date, all the acts which come to the National Council or the Council locale.Gli Acts relating to each deal came together in separate files, each of which is scored against by a proper number and reported in a separate section.

Article 78 Article 78. (Omitted) (1). (1) The provisions of this Article shall be without legal force as the articles mentioned herein are deemed repealed, because the reference to the Fascist unions, suppressed by d.lg.lgt. November 23 1944, no 369. Article 79

Art 79.Ai members of the Bar Council and members of committees for examination by the lawyer [and prosecutor], that do not belong to government departments shall be paid in addition to any compensation for travel and subsistence belonging to officials of the fifth degree, an attendance of 1,000 lire for every day of meeting. To those who are state officials, as well as any travel and subsistence allowance corresponding to the degree will be awarded an attendance of 1,000 lire for every day of meeting (1). The attendance fees are subject to a reduction of 12% , pursuant to Royal Decree 20 November 1930, No 1491 (2). (1) The amount the attendance was so high dpr January 11, 1956, No 5. (2) Directors' fees and remuneration committee of the DPR Jan. 11, 1956, No Article 5 have been deleted anyway. 2, l. December 27, 1973, No 851.

Article 80 Article 80. (Omitted) (1). (1) The provisions of this Article shall be considered obsolete following the entry into force of d.lg.lgt. November 23, 1944, No 382.

Article 81 Article 81. (Omitted) (1). (1) The provisions of this Article shall be considered obsolete following the entry into force of d.lg.lgt. November 23, 1944, No 382.

Article 82 Article 82. [Prosecutors], which exert their office in a case that takes place outside the jurisdiction of the tribunal to which they are assigned, shall, when established in the trial itself, give an address at the place where the seat of the court before which the trial is the absence corso.In the address for service, this means service at the Registry of that court. Article 83

Art 83.Sono repealed the provisions of the first and second paragraphs of Article. Royal Decree 18 of September 28, 1933, No 1282. However, [the prosecutors] are currently admitted to practice before the courts established by the DL, and belonging to the district of another district court of appeal may continue to perform their work at the same courts in the affairs promoted, with their intervention, to court before 1 February 1934. Article 84

Art 84.È also be subject to issue, under Article. Royal Decree 101 of 27 November 1933, No 1578, additional rules are necessary to integrate, implement and coordinate with other leggi.Il this decree will be implemented simultaneously with the entry into force of the Royal Decree of 27 November 1933, No 1578.